8/17/2012

[macsupport] Digest Number 9067

11 New Messages

Digest #9067
1a
Re: JPEG or TIF by "Vixpix" nyskater
1b
Re: JPEG or TIF by "Ken" avliska
1c
Re: JPEG or TIF by "Vixpix" nyskater
1d
Re: JPEG or TIF by "OBrien" conorboru
1e
Re: JPEG or TIF by "Dane Reugger" dar2112
1f
Re: JPEG or TIF by "T Hopkins" todhop
1g
Re: JPEG or TIF by "T Hopkins" todhop
2a
Re: AppleTV by "T Hopkins" todhop
2b
Re: AppleTV by "Vixpix" nyskater
2c
Re: AppleTV by ""Harry F."" hflaxman001
3a
Re: Apple mail disconnect by "T Hopkins" todhop

Messages

Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:16 am (PDT) . Posted by:

"Vixpix" nyskater

I'm guessing that you are not a pro photographer, so I say that you should not have any need for TIFs.

Vickie 

Sent from a spoiled little iPad

On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:44 AM, "Ken" <avlisk@cox.net> wrote:

> I'm shopping for a photograph to digital converter. I found one at Hammacher/Schlemmer that will convert them to JPEG or TIF. Which format should I use? I use iPhoto and a digital camera now, and haven't a clue what it takes or how they are stored in iPhoto, but I'm guessing that I should digitize my photographs in the same format. Thanks.

Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:19 am (PDT) . Posted by:

"Ken" avliska

Not a pro. Just an old, retired guy with several 40 and 50 year old scrapbooks that I'd like to get into my computer's iPhoto.

> I'm guessing that you are not a pro photographer, so I say that you should not have any need for TIFs.
>
> Vickie 

> On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:44 AM, "Ken" <avlisk@...> wrote:
>
> > I'm shopping for a photograph to digital converter. I found one at Hammacher/Schlemmer that will convert them to JPEG or TIF. Which format should I use? I use iPhoto and a digital camera now, and haven't a clue what it takes or how they are stored in iPhoto, but I'm guessing that I should digitize my photographs in the same format. Thanks.
>

Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:40 am (PDT) . Posted by:

"Vixpix" nyskater

Yes, you just need jpgs, which are compressed images and best for what you're doing. Uncompressed TIFs are very large in size, and are good if you plan on printing large sizes. It takes up a lot of space on your hard drive. JPGs, however, are still good for printing 5x7s and 8x10s.

Vickie 

Sent from a spoiled little iPad

On Aug 17, 2012, at 11:19 AM, "Ken" <avlisk@cox.net> wrote:

> Not a pro. Just an old, retired guy with several 40 and 50 year old scrapbooks that I'd like to get into my computer's iPhoto.

Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:45 am (PDT) . Posted by:

"OBrien" conorboru

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:44:18 -0000, Ken wrote:
> I'm shopping for a photograph to digital converter. I found one at
> Hammacher/Schlemmer that will convert them to JPEG or TIF. Which
> format should I use? I use iPhoto and a digital camera now, and
> haven't a clue what it takes or how they are stored in iPhoto, but
> I'm guessing that I should digitize my photographs in the same
> format. Thanks.

I'm not sure what you mean by "photograph to digital converter". Do you mean a scanner? If so, I would get an Epson flatbed scanner if you're scanning prints. Epson is has a reputation of being one of the best brands. Also, you might consider getting an imaging editing application...Adobe Photoshop Elements ("lite" version of Photoshop) is very good. With this app, you will be able to edit your scanned photos and save them as a .psd (Photoshop), a .tif, or a .jpg file. In practice, you will use/control the scanner from within Elements. When the photo is scanned, it will appear in a window in Elements for you to save, or edit and save to whatever format you want.

You'll want to be able to work with, and save both TIFs and JPGs.

The EPSON Perfection V33 Scanner might be a good, inexpensive choice.
<http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/jsp/ProductCategory.do?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&oid=-16223>

Adobe Elements:
<http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop-elements.html>


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

O'Brien ––– –... .-. .. . -.

Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:45 am (PDT) . Posted by:

"Dane Reugger" dar2112

It would depend on your long term plans.

Tiff is uncompressed so the image is generally higher quality but this
means they will take up more space, load in a picture viewer slower, etc.

JPEG / JPG - is compressed and image quality will suffer - whether or not
you'll notice will depend on you and what you are doing.

Generally I would advise TIFF if you have the resources and converting them
to JPEG as needed - for example to email them or post online.

You will also want to consider the result ion and color depth for your
project.

FWIW - I'm neither a photographer or graphic designer so maybe someone with
more experience will chime in.

-Dane

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Ken <avlisk@cox.net> wrote:

> Not a pro. Just an old, retired guy with several 40 and 50 year old
> scrapbooks that I'd like to get into my computer's iPhoto.
>
>
> > I'm guessing that you are not a pro photographer, so I say that you
> should not have any need for TIFs.
> >
> > Vickie 
>
> > On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:44 AM, "Ken" <avlisk@...> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm shopping for a photograph to digital converter. I found one at
> Hammacher/Schlemmer that will convert them to JPEG or TIF. Which format
> should I use? I use iPhoto and a digital camera now, and haven't a clue
> what it takes or how they are stored in iPhoto, but I'm guessing that I
> should digitize my photographs in the same format. Thanks.
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Group FAQ:
> <http://www.macsupportcentral.com/policies/>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:50 am (PDT) . Posted by:

"T Hopkins" todhop

TIFFs are fully uncompressed or "bit mapped" images. They are large (in file size). These are generally only for images that you will be actively modifying at high quality and resolution. That is, professional work. JPEGs are compressed. How much is up to you when you make them. At the highest quality (least compressed) they are "lossless" meaning they contain all the meaningful data of the original, but in a more efficient form. They look the same as the original. Most JPEGs are at medium to high quality (these are arbitrary labels). Almost all digital cameras record JPEGs at high quality.

So, JPEG, at high quality.

Cheers,
tod

Tod Hopkins
Hillmann & Carr Inc.
todhopkins-at-hillmanncarr.com

On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:44 AM, Ken wrote:

> I'm shopping for a photograph to digital converter. I found one at Hammacher/Schlemmer that will convert them to JPEG or TIF. Which format should I use? I use iPhoto and a digital camera now, and haven't a clue what it takes or how they are stored in iPhoto, but I'm guessing that I should digitize my photographs in the same format. Thanks.
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:55 am (PDT) . Posted by:

"T Hopkins" todhop

Correcting my previous post... JPEG can be lossless, particularly JPEG2000, but not in all variations. Setting a standard JPEG compressor at 100 may not be technically lossless.

Cheers,
tod

Tod Hopkins
Hillmann & Carr Inc.
todhopkins-at-hillmanncarr.com

On Aug 17, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Dane Reugger wrote:

> It would depend on your long term plans.
>
> Tiff is uncompressed so the image is generally higher quality but this
> means they will take up more space, load in a picture viewer slower, etc.
>
> JPEG / JPG - is compressed and image quality will suffer - whether or not
> you'll notice will depend on you and what you are doing.
>
> Generally I would advise TIFF if you have the resources and converting them
> to JPEG as needed - for example to email them or post online.
>
> You will also want to consider the result ion and color depth for your
> project.
>
> FWIW - I'm neither a photographer or graphic designer so maybe someone with
> more experience will chime in.
>
> -Dane
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Ken <avlisk@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > Not a pro. Just an old, retired guy with several 40 and 50 year old
> > scrapbooks that I'd like to get into my computer's iPhoto.
> >
> >
> > > I'm guessing that you are not a pro photographer, so I say that you
> > should not have any need for TIFs.
> > >
> > > Vickie 
> >
> > > On Aug 17, 2012, at 10:44 AM, "Ken" <avlisk@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm shopping for a photograph to digital converter. I found one at
> > Hammacher/Schlemmer that will convert them to JPEG or TIF. Which format
> > should I use? I use iPhoto and a digital camera now, and haven't a clue
> > what it takes or how they are stored in iPhoto, but I'm guessing that I
> > should digitize my photographs in the same format. Thanks.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Group FAQ:
> > <http://www.macsupportcentral.com/policies/>
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:40 am (PDT) . Posted by:

"T Hopkins" todhop

Not sure I understand the question? Apple TV exists. What does it need cable and "Hollywood" for?

Cheers,
tod

Tod Hopkins
Hillmann & Carr Inc.
todhopkins-at-hillmanncarr.com

On Aug 17, 2012, at 1:53 AM, HAL9000 wrote:

> Does anyone think within the next year that Apple will successfully partner w cable and Hollywood so Apple can build and sell it's AppleTV? Or do you think that the XBox will get there first?
>
> jr
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:44 am (PDT) . Posted by:

"Vixpix" nyskater

Without Steve Jobs, it's hard to tell. It would be cool if they could be on top in that market.

Vickie 

Sent from a spoiled little iPad

On Aug 17, 2012, at 1:53 AM, "HAL9000" <jrswebhome@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Does anyone think within the next year that Apple will successfully partner w cable and Hollywood so Apple can build and sell it's AppleTV? Or do you think that the XBox will get there first?

Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:47 am (PDT) . Posted by:

""Harry F."" hflaxman001



--- Original Message ---

From: "T Hopkins" <hoplist@hillmanncarr.com>
Sent: August 17, 2012 11:40 AM
To: macsupportcentral@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [macsupport] AppleTV

Not sure I understand the question? Apple TV exists. What does it need cable and "Hollywood" for?

Cheers,
tod

Tod Hopkins
Hillmann & Carr Inc.
todhopkins-at-hillmanncarr.com

On Aug 17, 2012, at 1:53 AM, HAL9000 wrote:

> Does anyone think within the next year that Apple will successfully partner w cable and Hollywood so Apple can build and sell it's AppleTV? Or do you think that the XBox will get there first

The latest news is. a cable box replacement, but much much more, according.to CNET.

Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:44 am (PDT) . Posted by:

"T Hopkins" todhop

Open the Mail Activity Windows and see what is actually happening. Let us know.

Cheers,
tod

Tod Hopkins
Hillmann & Carr Inc.
todhopkins-at-hillmanncarr.com

On Aug 16, 2012, at 9:30 PM, bill wisse wrote:

> Hi All
>
> After upgrading to ML on my iMac ( april 2012) I have a problem with Apple
> Mail.
>
> Every time the comp wakes up from sleep, Apple Mail will not connect to the
> Internet. I have to manually quit and restart and then everything is ok.
>
> Anybody has an idea to fix this? I looked around in the forums but couldn't
> find anything.
>
> Thanks
>
> Bill W
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

GROUP FOOTER MESSAGE