6 New Messages
Digest #9772
Messages
Fri Sep 20, 2013 12:46 am (PDT) . Posted by:
"Tauqir Rana" ranatqr
I tried repairing preferences and re installing the Flash. Barrie, the institute recommended nNOT to use Chrome as a browser based on the opinion of their IT.
On Sep 20, 2013, at 10:40 AM, barrie parsons <barrieparsons552@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Try installing Google Chrome a very good browser...It comes complete with Adobe Flash.best of luck Barrie.
> P.S I also have enrolled online for web science and the power of branding.I am really pleased about the online
> courses.
>
>
> On 20 September 2013 08:07, <ranatqr@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I have enrolled myself on an online course. The program has a series of lecture which needs Adobe Presenter to view may be as Flash file. I have not been able to view the lectures using Safari or Firefox insipte of updating Adobe Flash to the latest and enabling Java. I have used MAcbook Air mid2012 2GHZ i7 or my 2011 IMac. I cna however see those on Windows machine however. I also tried Flash to HTLM5 ver 2.7. Can anybody help me how to be able to see these lectures
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> T Rana MD
>
>
>
>
On Sep 20, 2013, at 10:40 AM, barrie parsons <barrieparsons552@
>
> Try installing Google Chrome a very good browser...It comes complete with Adobe Flash.best of luck Barrie.
> P.S I also have enrolled online for web science and the power of branding.I am really pleased about the online
> courses.
>
>
> On 20 September 2013 08:07, <ranatqr@yahoo.
>
> I have enrolled myself on an online course. The program has a series of lecture which needs Adobe Presenter to view may be as Flash file. I have not been able to view the lectures using Safari or Firefox insipte of updating Adobe Flash to the latest and enabling Java. I have used MAcbook Air mid2012 2GHZ i7 or my 2011 IMac. I cna however see those on Windows machine however. I also tried Flash to HTLM5 ver 2.7. Can anybody help me how to be able to see these lectures
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> T Rana MD
>
>
>
>
Fri Sep 20, 2013 12:52 am (PDT) . Posted by:
"Tony" nyrngrz
I just saw this on the news and googled for the information. Looks like we will be seeing a fix soon for this soon. Here it is:
http://techcrunch.com/2013/09/19/ios-7-lock-screen-vulnerability-discovered-gives-access-to-photos-and-social-sharing/
Tony
http://techcrunch.
Tony
Fri Sep 20, 2013 2:52 am (PDT) . Posted by:
"Denver Dan" denverdan22180
Howdy.
Apple has just released iOS 7.0.1 which may be a fix for the lock
screen issue.
iOS 7.0.1 has to do with a Touch ID and purchase "vulnerability."
Denver Dan
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:52:53 -0700 (PDT), Tony wrote:
>
> I just saw this on the news and googled for the information. Looks
> like we will be seeing a fix soon for this soon. Here it is:
>
>
http://techcrunch.com/2013/09/19/ios-7-lock-screen-vulnerability-discovered-gives-access-to-photos-and-social-sharing/
>
>
> Tony
Apple has just released iOS 7.0.1 which may be a fix for the lock
screen issue.
iOS 7.0.1 has to do with a Touch ID and purchase "vulnerability
Denver Dan
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:52:53 -0700 (PDT), Tony wrote:
>
> I just saw this on the news and googled for the information. Looks
> like we will be seeing a fix soon for this soon. Here it is:
>
>
http://techcrunch.
>
>
> Tony
Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:15 am (PDT) . Posted by:
"Otto Nikolaus" nikyzf
Dan,
Yep, they only *seemed* to close. Have you never double-clicked the Home
button before?
Otto
On 20 September 2013 04:08, Denver Dan <denver.dan@verizon.net> wrote:
> Howdy.
>
> The apps all seemed to close for me with a one press on the Home button
> since my first iPhone 3G.
>
> What have I been missing?
>
> . . . . . Hummm? Just doing some reading.
>
> Apparently I have missed this feature for YEARS!
>
> Ye Gods and Little Fishes!
>
> Denver Dan
>
> <http://www.tuaw.com/2010/06/30/iphone-101-quitting-apps-in-ios-4/>
>
Yep, they only *seemed* to close. Have you never double-clicked the Home
button before?
Otto
On 20 September 2013 04:08, Denver Dan <denver.dan@verizon.
> Howdy.
>
> The apps all seemed to close for me with a one press on the Home button
> since my first iPhone 3G.
>
> What have I been missing?
>
> . . . . . Hummm? Just doing some reading.
>
> Apparently I have missed this feature for YEARS!
>
> Ye Gods and Little Fishes!
>
> Denver Dan
>
> <http://www.tuaw.
>
Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:27 am (PDT) . Posted by:
"Denver Dan" denverdan22180
Howdy.
I guess not on the double-click of Home. Feeling a bit chagrined.
It's odd to have missed something like that for years but then I bet
I'm not the only one to have missed it.
Denver Dan
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:14:55 +0100, Otto Nikolaus wrote:
> Yep, they only *seemed* to close. Have you never double-clicked the
> Home button before?
>
> Otto
I guess not on the double-click of Home. Feeling a bit chagrined.
It's odd to have missed something like that for years but then I bet
I'm not the only one to have missed it.
Denver Dan
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:14:55 +0100, Otto Nikolaus wrote:
> Yep, they only *seemed* to close. Have you never double-clicked the
> Home button before?
>
> Otto
Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:45 am (PDT) . Posted by:
"Denver Dan" denverdan22180
Howdy.
The "group" iOS 7 Folder thing is right. An iOS 7 Folder holds fewer
icons and has to have a 2nd screen that you slide to. That solves the
problem of a limited number of icons in a folder in iOS 6 and prior but
it still seems a waste of good space.
The percent of updated iDevices is interesting because it points up one
of the major problems with Android which has recently being getting a
lot of press attention. The problem is the fragmentation of Android
with hundreds of makers and suppliers, with some devices never being
upgraded by a new Android OS because the maker won't do it, and with
many versions of Android making it very difficult to produce apps that
work on all versions.
Denver Dan
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:48:03 -0400, Jim Harry wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Denver Dan <denver.dan@verizon.net> wrote:
>> The new flat style seems just fine.
>
> My only complaint of the new style/interface is with the iPad. iOS7
> restricts the number of icons to show and now groups are paged
> through. Probably extends the total number of apps available in a
> group, but artificially limiting the number of icons visible at once
> is a waste of the extra screen real estate.
>
>> Also read that after 24 hours of being available that 29% of eligible
>> iPhone/iPad/iPod Touch devices had been updated to iOS 7 while the most
>> recent version of Android, released almost 4 months ago, has been
>> installed only on less than 1% of Android devices.
>
> I wonder what the point of this statement is (not just you, but in
> general when people quote it). It's a bit of comparing apples to
> oranges. Apple's tighter control over both hardware and software
> certainly makes it much easier to manage a transition like this, and
> in some cases you don't really have a choice. Google manages the
> core software, but leaves it up to the various manufacturers to
> decide on their own flavor, features, compatibility, etc. As an
> early adopter, I like to have the latest and greatest, but for the
> vast majority of the population, it just doesn't matter that much.
>
> Jim H.
The "group" iOS 7 Folder thing is right. An iOS 7 Folder holds fewer
icons and has to have a 2nd screen that you slide to. That solves the
problem of a limited number of icons in a folder in iOS 6 and prior but
it still seems a waste of good space.
The percent of updated iDevices is interesting because it points up one
of the major problems with Android which has recently being getting a
lot of press attention. The problem is the fragmentation of Android
with hundreds of makers and suppliers, with some devices never being
upgraded by a new Android OS because the maker won't do it, and with
many versions of Android making it very difficult to produce apps that
work on all versions.
Denver Dan
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:48:03 -0400, Jim Harry wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Denver Dan <denver.dan@verizon.
>> The new flat style seems just fine.
>
> My only complaint of the new style/interface is with the iPad. iOS7
> restricts the number of icons to show and now groups are paged
> through. Probably extends the total number of apps available in a
> group, but artificially limiting the number of icons visible at once
> is a waste of the extra screen real estate.
>
>> Also read that after 24 hours of being available that 29% of eligible
>> iPhone/iPad/
>> recent version of Android, released almost 4 months ago, has been
>> installed only on less than 1% of Android devices.
>
> I wonder what the point of this statement is (not just you, but in
> general when people quote it). It's a bit of comparing apples to
> oranges. Apple's tighter control over both hardware and software
> certainly makes it much easier to manage a transition like this, and
> in some cases you don't really have a choice. Google manages the
> core software, but leaves it up to the various manufacturers to
> decide on their own flavor, features, compatibility, etc. As an
> early adopter, I like to have the latest and greatest, but for the
> vast majority of the population, it just doesn't matter that much.
>
> Jim H.
GROUP FOOTER MESSAGE
