15 New Messages
Digest #9309
Messages
Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:52 pm (PST) . Posted by:
"Otto Nikolaus" nikyzf
You say "reaching the limites of excel". I have to ask: just what are you
doing? Why do you think your Mac is the problem?
If it's a database, shouldn't you be using a proper database app?
If it's stats, shouldn't you be using R or similar?
(Excel tries to do everything, but it's a *spreadsheet* app, not a true
database or stats app.)
Otto
On 1 January 2013 00:55, davidu <davidoutterback@yahoo.com > wrote:
> In 2011 I did a lot of research on a MC812LL/A
> I do heavy data in excel sometime reaching the limites of excel
> of which my corrent computer purchased in 2007 having replace
> the motherboard with a generic one and upgrading my memory
> using windows home xp and microsoft home and student 2010.
>
> I've been reading posts now for over a year and it seems
> like there are problems with the imacs too.
>
> So now again I'm thinking about purchasing a imac and I've a few
> questions:
>
> 1) MC812LL/A has old version and new version. Whats better? or
> is there a better option?
> B&H discontinued the MC812LL/A and I wonder about the new
> version. Articles comparing to the old version versus the
> new verwsion are no longer on line. It sound like the
> old verson has advantages. What are they?
> 2) The MC812LL/A purchased in 2011 did not have the LION installed
> and I live abroad now, having no way to install this within the
> 30 days after purchase.
> 3) What do you do when your 3 year additional warrenty runs out.
> Is it worth fixing having to depend on a Mac store repairing it.
>
> 4) On utube a fellow claims bad connections, no longer gold
> connections account for the shorter life of a computer.
> Does the Imac store clean computer for corresion under their
> service plan or extra warrenty period?
>
> I use of course email, facebook, online searches,
> have lots of excel spreadsheets that are extrememly large,
> have thousands of photos and have an EPson2780 to load pix
> wondering if that will work on MC812LL/A ?
> Am tentatively planning on getting an IPOD for music in lieu of
> my technics stereo and digitize the 200 CD's.
>
> Thus I need at least 1 tet of memory in additon to my passbook
> essential, a godsave of the hours of work on programs, data,
> and other notepad messages.
>
> I am able to ship the computer abroad and use the Imac store
> abroad under warrenty as I've checked that out in emails to
> Mac. The cost of buying abroad at imac is considerably more
> than the u.s. and I must declare and pay an extrea $60 for the
> shipping of a new computer.
>
> 5) What are the biggest problems with a new Imac, especially the MC812LL/A?
>
> I'm 71, a a retired corporate analyst and I don't want a lot of
> problems as I grow older. I cannot really comprehend why a computer
> can't last as long as a television that also has tin connections.
>
> 6) With my intel motherboard, when it dies a few years later
> there are no replacements available. With a Imac, are original
> motherboards available after a few years in lieu of a generic
> motherboard.
>
> 7) How often do you have to replace RAM memory?
>
> 8) I've read on your forum one can download microsoft
> exel. How does that work?
>
> 9) How can I transfer m.s. word, paint, notepad to an IMAC
> or are there problems as I've years of data I would not want
> to lose.
>
> 10) Are there any other issues I might need to know?
> 11) Does magicjack work well with the IMac?
> 12) Wheres the best place to purchase an Imac especially the
> old version of MC812LL/A or is there a better Imac?
>
> I don't want to get where I spend more than five hours a day
> on the computer and have to devote so much time to problems.
> Over the last year I've read posts by those whom love windows
> but were happy to switch to Apples Imac.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
doing? Why do you think your Mac is the problem?
If it's a database, shouldn't you be using a proper database app?
If it's stats, shouldn't you be using R or similar?
(Excel tries to do everything, but it's a *spreadsheet* app, not a true
database or stats app.)
Otto
On 1 January 2013 00:55, davidu <davidoutterback@
> In 2011 I did a lot of research on a MC812LL/A
> I do heavy data in excel sometime reaching the limites of excel
> of which my corrent computer purchased in 2007 having replace
> the motherboard with a generic one and upgrading my memory
> using windows home xp and microsoft home and student 2010.
>
> I've been reading posts now for over a year and it seems
> like there are problems with the imacs too.
>
> So now again I'm thinking about purchasing a imac and I've a few
> questions:
>
> 1) MC812LL/A has old version and new version. Whats better? or
> is there a better option?
> B&H discontinued the MC812LL/A and I wonder about the new
> version. Articles comparing to the old version versus the
> new verwsion are no longer on line. It sound like the
> old verson has advantages. What are they?
> 2) The MC812LL/A purchased in 2011 did not have the LION installed
> and I live abroad now, having no way to install this within the
> 30 days after purchase.
> 3) What do you do when your 3 year additional warrenty runs out.
> Is it worth fixing having to depend on a Mac store repairing it.
>
> 4) On utube a fellow claims bad connections, no longer gold
> connections account for the shorter life of a computer.
> Does the Imac store clean computer for corresion under their
> service plan or extra warrenty period?
>
> I use of course email, facebook, online searches,
> have lots of excel spreadsheets that are extrememly large,
> have thousands of photos and have an EPson2780 to load pix
> wondering if that will work on MC812LL/A ?
> Am tentatively planning on getting an IPOD for music in lieu of
> my technics stereo and digitize the 200 CD's.
>
> Thus I need at least 1 tet of memory in additon to my passbook
> essential, a godsave of the hours of work on programs, data,
> and other notepad messages.
>
> I am able to ship the computer abroad and use the Imac store
> abroad under warrenty as I've checked that out in emails to
> Mac. The cost of buying abroad at imac is considerably more
> than the u.s. and I must declare and pay an extrea $60 for the
> shipping of a new computer.
>
> 5) What are the biggest problems with a new Imac, especially the MC812LL/A?
>
> I'm 71, a a retired corporate analyst and I don't want a lot of
> problems as I grow older. I cannot really comprehend why a computer
> can't last as long as a television that also has tin connections.
>
> 6) With my intel motherboard, when it dies a few years later
> there are no replacements available. With a Imac, are original
> motherboards available after a few years in lieu of a generic
> motherboard.
>
> 7) How often do you have to replace RAM memory?
>
> 8) I've read on your forum one can download microsoft
> exel. How does that work?
>
> 9) How can I transfer m.s. word, paint, notepad to an IMAC
> or are there problems as I've years of data I would not want
> to lose.
>
> 10) Are there any other issues I might need to know?
> 11) Does magicjack work well with the IMac?
> 12) Wheres the best place to purchase an Imac especially the
> old version of MC812LL/A or is there a better Imac?
>
> I don't want to get where I spend more than five hours a day
> on the computer and have to devote so much time to problems.
> Over the last year I've read posts by those whom love windows
> but were happy to switch to Apples Imac.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:25 pm (PST) . Posted by:
"Jim Saklad" jimdoc01
> In 2011 I did a lot of research on a MC812LL/A
> .....
> 1) MC812LL/A has old version and new version.
MacTracker lists only one model with that designation:
OVERVIEW
Introduced May 2011
Discontinued October 2012
Model Identifier iMac12,1
Model Number A1311
Order Number MC309LL/A (2.5 GHz), MC812LL/A (2.7 GHz)
There are two later 21.5" iMacs, however.
> Whats better? or is there a better option?
What seem to be the differences between "old version" and "new version" according to your sources?
> 5) What are the biggest problems with a new iMac, especially the MC812LL/A?
A NEW iMac would be a "Late 2012" model, not a "discontinued over a year ago" model:
OVERVIEW
Introduced October 2012
Discontinued --
Model Identifier iMac13,1
Model Number A1418
Order Number MD093LL/A (2.7 GHz), MD094LL/A (2.9 GHz)
> 12) Wheres the best place to purchase an iMac especially the old version of MC812LL/A or is there a better iMac?
<http://lowendmac.com/deals/best-intel-imac-prices.html >
Best Used Core i iMac Prices
21.5" 3.0 GHz Core i3, $939 shipped, PowerMax
Best Close-out iMac Prices (shipped)
21.5" 2.5 GHz 4-core i5, $1,149, Amazon.com, PowerMax
21.5" 2.7 GHz 4-core i5, $1,380 + shipping, Amazon.com
21.5" 2.8 GHz 4-core i7, $1,799, B&H
Best Late 2012 iMac Prices (shipped)
21.5" 2.7 GHz 4-core i5, $1,294, MacMall
21.5" 2.9 GHz 4-core i5, $1,494, MacMall
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@icloud.com
> .....
> 1) MC812LL/A has old version and new version.
MacTracker lists only one model with that designation:
OVERVIEW
Introduced May 2011
Discontinued October 2012
Model Identifier iMac12,1
Model Number A1311
Order Number MC309LL/A (2.5 GHz), MC812LL/A (2.7 GHz)
There are two later 21.5" iMacs, however.
> Whats better? or is there a better option?
What seem to be the differences between "old version" and "new version" according to your sources?
> 5) What are the biggest problems with a new iMac, especially the MC812LL/A?
A NEW iMac would be a "Late 2012" model, not a "discontinued over a year ago" model:
OVERVIEW
Introduced October 2012
Discontinued --
Model Identifier iMac13,1
Model Number A1418
Order Number MD093LL/A (2.7 GHz), MD094LL/A (2.9 GHz)
> 12) Wheres the best place to purchase an iMac especially the old version of MC812LL/A or is there a better iMac?
<http://lowendmac.
Best Used Core i iMac Prices
21.5" 3.0 GHz Core i3, $939 shipped, PowerMax
Best Close-out iMac Prices (shipped)
21.5" 2.5 GHz 4-core i5, $1,149, Amazon.com, PowerMax
21.5" 2.7 GHz 4-core i5, $1,380 + shipping, Amazon.com
21.5" 2.8 GHz 4-core i7, $1,799, B&H
Best Late 2012 iMac Prices (shipped)
21.5" 2.7 GHz 4-core i5, $1,294, MacMall
21.5" 2.9 GHz 4-core i5, $1,494, MacMall
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@icloud.
Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:16 pm (PST) . Posted by:
"Don" don.96705
Thanks Dave & Jim for backing up my figures. I estimated 42 cents, it changes a couple times a year.
This is probably TMI but some may find it interesting.
On Kauai power glitches are very short, milliseconds long, just enough to force a computer reboot but too short for a CFL bulb to flicker. I got those several times a day the first year I was here. Power is more stable now, a couple glitches a month. I run on an APC RS-700 UPS. Don't know how much power that box uses internally but it has several advantages. Didn't know this when I bought it but in addition to the battery backup outlets there are no backup switched outlets. If the power use on the #1 backup outlet drops to some low threshold the switched outlets turn off. My monitor, scanner, speakers are totally off when the Mac Pro sleeps.
I grew up in Minnesota, the land of ten thousand lakes & the ten thousand thunder storms. Learned to unplug everything quickly, used a three foot scrap of PVC pipe with a hook on the end. I had to wait six and a half years for the first thunder storm here on Kauai. The Grinch hit three weeks ago. I got every expensive thing unplugged, without my insulated hook. The storm took out a bedroom clock ($12) and LED christmas lights ($100) & timer ($25) outside. AND one bulb in a light fixture at the top of a vaulted ceiling. That was like a police flash bang going off. Couldn't see anything for a couple seconds and ears ringing for probably ten seconds.
The neighbor across the street had some damage in the meter box, and the power company spent several hours with an underground cable crossing the street just a hundred feet from me.
Don at 21.9N 159.6W
Mac Pro OS X 10.7.5
On Dec 31, 2012, at 13:04, Jim Saklad wrote:
>>> I'm not sure of the power use by an iMac my MacPro currently is running at 200 watts, according to the power meter on my UPS. Sleeping it uses 3 watts or less. That's just over $2.00 per day that not sleeping costs where I live, using the highest cost electricity in the USA.
>>
>> I must admit I know very little about the cost per hour ranges for electricity in the US, but I find it hard to believe that 200 Watts translates to $2 per day. Were that the case, two light bulbs would cost you $60 per month!
>
> 200 Watts X 24 hr = 4800 Wh = 4.8 kWh
> $2.00/4.8kWh = 41.7¢/kWh
>
> On Lanai, in the Hawaiian Islands, electricity costs average about 45¢/kWh.
>
> Block Island, RI, presently gets ALL its electricity from diesel generators; when oil prices hit a record in July 2008, electricity rates there reached 62¢/kWh.
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@icloud.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Group FAQ:
> <http://www.macsupportcentral.com/policies/ >
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
This is probably TMI but some may find it interesting.
On Kauai power glitches are very short, milliseconds long, just enough to force a computer reboot but too short for a CFL bulb to flicker. I got those several times a day the first year I was here. Power is more stable now, a couple glitches a month. I run on an APC RS-700 UPS. Don't know how much power that box uses internally but it has several advantages. Didn't know this when I bought it but in addition to the battery backup outlets there are no backup switched outlets. If the power use on the #1 backup outlet drops to some low threshold the switched outlets turn off. My monitor, scanner, speakers are totally off when the Mac Pro sleeps.
I grew up in Minnesota, the land of ten thousand lakes & the ten thousand thunder storms. Learned to unplug everything quickly, used a three foot scrap of PVC pipe with a hook on the end. I had to wait six and a half years for the first thunder storm here on Kauai. The Grinch hit three weeks ago. I got every expensive thing unplugged, without my insulated hook. The storm took out a bedroom clock ($12) and LED christmas lights ($100) & timer ($25) outside. AND one bulb in a light fixture at the top of a vaulted ceiling. That was like a police flash bang going off. Couldn't see anything for a couple seconds and ears ringing for probably ten seconds.
The neighbor across the street had some damage in the meter box, and the power company spent several hours with an underground cable crossing the street just a hundred feet from me.
Don at 21.9N 159.6W
Mac Pro OS X 10.7.5
On Dec 31, 2012, at 13:04, Jim Saklad wrote:
>>> I'm not sure of the power use by an iMac my MacPro currently is running at 200 watts, according to the power meter on my UPS. Sleeping it uses 3 watts or less. That's just over $2.00 per day that not sleeping costs where I live, using the highest cost electricity in the USA.
>>
>> I must admit I know very little about the cost per hour ranges for electricity in the US, but I find it hard to believe that 200 Watts translates to $2 per day. Were that the case, two light bulbs would cost you $60 per month!
>
> 200 Watts X 24 hr = 4800 Wh = 4.8 kWh
> $2.00/4.8kWh = 41.7¢/kWh
>
> On Lanai, in the Hawaiian Islands, electricity costs average about 45¢/kWh.
>
> Block Island, RI, presently gets ALL its electricity from diesel generators; when oil prices hit a record in July 2008, electricity rates there reached 62¢/kWh.
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@icloud.
>
>
>
> ------------
>
> Group FAQ:
> <http://www.macsuppo
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:27 pm (PST) . Posted by:
"N.A. Nada"
Don, Dave & Jim,
Those rates are eye-openers. I don't mean to rub it in, but I am thankful for the BPA, who was established to keep the rates down in the Pacific NW. In metro-Portland I have been paying under 10-cents, and I thought the national average was about 11-cents.
HI & RI need more wind turbines. Wind is cheaper than diesel, and takes up a lot less land than solar with higher production rates.
Brent
On Dec 31, 2012, at 7:16 PM, Don wrote:
Thanks Dave & Jim for backing up my figures. I estimated 42 cents, it changes a couple times a year.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Those rates are eye-openers. I don't mean to rub it in, but I am thankful for the BPA, who was established to keep the rates down in the Pacific NW. In metro-Portland I have been paying under 10-cents, and I thought the national average was about 11-cents.
HI & RI need more wind turbines. Wind is cheaper than diesel, and takes up a lot less land than solar with higher production rates.
Brent
On Dec 31, 2012, at 7:16 PM, Don wrote:
Thanks Dave & Jim for backing up my figures. I estimated 42 cents, it changes a couple times a year.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:30 pm (PST) . Posted by:
"Jim Saklad" jimdoc01
> I grew up in Minnesota, the land of ten thousand lakes & the ten thousand thunder storms. Learned to unplug everything quickly, used a three foot scrap of PVC pipe with a hook on the end. I had to wait six and a half years for the first thunder storm here on Kauai. The Grinch hit three weeks ago. I got every expensive thing unplugged, without my insulated hook. The storm took out a bedroom clock ($12) and LED christmas lights ($100) & timer ($25) outside. AND one bulb in a light fixture at the top of a vaulted ceiling. That was like a police flash bang going off. Couldn't see anything for a couple seconds and ears ringing for probably ten seconds.
>
> The neighbor across the street had some damage in the meter box, and the power company spent several hours with an underground cable crossing the street just a hundred feet from me.
Hurricane Sandy was nearly the first major storm -- hurricane, blizzard, or plain ol' thunderstorm -- in many years in which we did NOT lose power.
Some years ago our local utility offered a whole-house surge protector, attached to the meter, for $6.50/month. It comes with a $10,000 insurance polity.
The ground strike that killed our driveway alarm, DISH network receiver, and dishwasher motherboard was just before that....
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@icloud.com
>
> The neighbor across the street had some damage in the meter box, and the power company spent several hours with an underground cable crossing the street just a hundred feet from me.
Hurricane Sandy was nearly the first major storm -- hurricane, blizzard, or plain ol' thunderstorm -- in many years in which we did NOT lose power.
Some years ago our local utility offered a whole-house surge protector, attached to the meter, for $6.50/month. It comes with a $10,000 insurance polity.
The ground strike that killed our driveway alarm, DISH network receiver, and dishwasher motherboard was just before that....
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@icloud.
Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:42 pm (PST) . Posted by:
"Jim Saklad" jimdoc01
> HI & RI need more wind turbines. Wind is cheaper than diesel, and takes up a lot less land than solar with higher production rates.
They're going up for Block Island, and are expected to drop their rate strikingly.
My spreadsheet is a couple of months behind, but my numbers indicate that the previous year cost me a net of 6.2¢/kWh -- 43% of those kWh from the grid, at 16.4¢/kWh, and 57% from my roof PV installation (counted as 0.0¢.kWh).
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@icloud.com
They're going up for Block Island, and are expected to drop their rate strikingly.
My spreadsheet is a couple of months behind, but my numbers indicate that the previous year cost me a net of 6.2¢/kWh -- 43% of those kWh from the grid, at 16.4¢/kWh, and 57% from my roof PV installation (counted as 0.0¢.kWh).
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@icloud.
Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:23 pm (PST) . Posted by:
"Daly Jessup" dalyjessup
On Dec 31, 2012, at 5:30 PM, Otto Nikolaus wrote:
>> Apple themselves realize this is a neat idea. Try it yourself in Contacts
>> on your Mac; open a contact, right-click on a phone number, and pick "large
>> type".
>>
>> I asked before how I could suggest adding this to iOS. Surely someone
>> knows an email address that is actually looked at at Apple.
>>
>
> I agree with you, but for now, go with what we have. :)
>
> For suggestions to Apple, try
> <http://www.apple.
Thanks, Otto. I have submitted my own suggestion to add this feature to iPhone Contacts.
Daly
Tue Jan 1, 2013 6:01 am (PST) . Posted by:
"James Robertson" jamesrob328i
On Dec 31, 2012, at 10:23 PM, Daly Jessup <jessup@san.rr.
> Thanks, Otto. I have submitted my own suggestion to add this feature to iPhone Contacts.
Thank YOU, Daly. Maybe if we flood them with the same request they'll realize it's a useful idea ;-)
--
Jim Robertson
__o
_-\<,_
(*)/ (*)
````````````
My other car is an S-Works Roubaix
Tue Jan 1, 2013 7:15 am (PST) . Posted by:
"yash@aol.com" dalepavlicek
I have a mac mini I-5 multi core. I have read in a whole lot of postings and sites that the mac mini, can use 16 gig of ram,not just the 8 as stated by apple. First is this correct? second is the additional 8 gigs of memory going to make a big or even a small change in the mini operation. What will be affected the most?
thanks
dale
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
thanks
dale
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Tue Jan 1, 2013 8:57 am (PST) . Posted by:
"Vandrei Jaques" vandrei_jaques
This will affect if you use a lot of programs at same time. Helps After Effects to make more quickly and responsive. If you use Final Cut Pro X, the performance will be increased. I read a lot of this stuff, which says, the Mini supports 16GB of ram. Actually i think this waste of money, 8GB is sufficient to work with Mini.
Happy new year
________________________________
De: "yash@aol.com" <yash@aol.com>
Para: macsupportcentral@yahoogroups.com
Enviadas: Terça-feira, 1 de Janeiro de 2013 13:15
Assunto: [macsupport] memory for latest mac mini
Â
I have a mac mini I-5 multi core. I have read in a whole lot of postings and sites that the mac mini, can use 16 gig of ram,not just the 8 as stated by apple. First is this correct? second is the additional 8 gigs of memory going to make a big or even a small change in the mini operation. What will be affected the most?
thanks
dale
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Happy new year
____________
De: "yash@aol.com" <yash@aol.com>
Para: macsupportcentral@
Enviadas: Terça-feira, 1 de Janeiro de 2013 13:15
Assunto: [macsupport] memory for latest mac mini
Â
I have a mac mini I-5 multi core. I have read in a whole lot of postings and sites that the mac mini, can use 16 gig of ram,not just the 8 as stated by apple. First is this correct? second is the additional 8 gigs of memory going to make a big or even a small change in the mini operation. What will be affected the most?
thanks
dale
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Tue Jan 1, 2013 9:10 am (PST) . Posted by:
"yash@aol.com" dalepavlicek
Jaques
thanks makes sense to me.
dale
-----Original Message-----
From: Vandrei Jaques <vandrei_jaques@yahoo.com.br >
To: macsupportcentral <macsupportcentral@yahoogroups.com >
Sent: Tue, Jan 1, 2013 11:57 am
Subject: Re: [macsupport] memory for latest mac mini
This will affect if you use a lot of programs at same time. Helps After Effects to make more quickly and responsive. If you use Final Cut Pro X, the performance will be increased. I read a lot of this stuff, which says, the Mini supports 16GB of ram. Actually i think this waste of money, 8GB is sufficient to work with Mini.
Happy new year
________________________________
De: "yash@aol.com" <yash@aol.com>
Para: macsupportcentral@yahoogroups.com
Enviadas: Terça-feira, 1 de Janeiro de 2013 13:15
Assunto: [macsupport] memory for latest mac mini
I have a mac mini I-5 multi core. I have read in a whole lot of postings and sites that the mac mini, can use 16 gig of ram,not just the 8 as stated by apple. First is this correct? second is the additional 8 gigs of memory going to make a big or even a small change in the mini operation. What will be affected the most?
thanks
dale
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
thanks makes sense to me.
dale
-----Original Message-----
From: Vandrei Jaques <vandrei_jaques@
To: macsupportcentral <macsupportcentral@
Sent: Tue, Jan 1, 2013 11:57 am
Subject: Re: [macsupport] memory for latest mac mini
This will affect if you use a lot of programs at same time. Helps After Effects to make more quickly and responsive. If you use Final Cut Pro X, the performance will be increased. I read a lot of this stuff, which says, the Mini supports 16GB of ram. Actually i think this waste of money, 8GB is sufficient to work with Mini.
Happy new year
____________
De: "yash@aol.com" <yash@aol.com>
Para: macsupportcentral@
Enviadas: Terça-feira, 1 de Janeiro de 2013 13:15
Assunto: [macsupport] memory for latest mac mini
I have a mac mini I-5 multi core. I have read in a whole lot of postings and sites that the mac mini, can use 16 gig of ram,not just the 8 as stated by apple. First is this correct? second is the additional 8 gigs of memory going to make a big or even a small change in the mini operation. What will be affected the most?
thanks
dale
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Tue Jan 1, 2013 8:53 am (PST) . Posted by:
"Robin" rlenhart
Tried doing a backup and received the following message -
Backup is too large for the backup disc.
I am trying to backup 154GB of data - message says only 107.9GB of free space is available
Isn't TM supposed to delete the oldest files if sufficient space is not available.
???
Rob Lenhart
Backup is too large for the backup disc.
I am trying to backup 154GB of data - message says only 107.9GB of free space is available
Isn't TM supposed to delete the oldest files if sufficient space is not available.
???
Rob Lenhart
Tue Jan 1, 2013 9:06 am (PST) . Posted by:
"Barry Austern" barryaus
On Jan 1, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Robin wrote:
> Tried doing a backup and received the following message -
>
> Backup is too large for the backup disc.
>
> I am trying to backup 154GB of data - message says only 107.9GB of free space is available
>
> Isn't TM supposed to delete the oldest files if sufficient space is not available.
>
> ???
>
> Rob Lenhart
>
>
Depends on the settings. Double check yours. What you say IS the default, but maybe you have changed it?
Barry Austern
barryaus@fuse.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Tue Jan 1, 2013 9:11 am (PST) . Posted by:
"Robin" rlenhart
Tried doing a backup and received the following message -
Backup is too large for the backup disc.
I am trying to backup 154GB of data - message says only 107.9GB of free space is available
Isn't TM supposed to delete the oldest files if sufficient space is not available.
???
Rob Lenhart
Backup is too large for the backup disc.
I am trying to backup 154GB of data - message says only 107.9GB of free space is available
Isn't TM supposed to delete the oldest files if sufficient space is not available.
???
Rob Lenhart
Tue Jan 1, 2013 9:11 am (PST) . Posted by:
"Robin" rlenhart
Tried doing a backup and received the following message -
Backup is too large for the backup disc.
I am trying to backup 154GB of data - message says only 107.9GB of free space is available
Isn't TM supposed to delete the oldest files if sufficient space is not available.
???
Rob Lenhart
Backup is too large for the backup disc.
I am trying to backup 154GB of data - message says only 107.9GB of free space is available
Isn't TM supposed to delete the oldest files if sufficient space is not available.
???
Rob Lenhart
GROUP FOOTER MESSAGE