Messages In This Digest (25 Messages)
- 1a.
- Re: reason not to GoDaddy ??? From: Daly Jessup
- 1b.
- Re: reason not to GoDaddy ??? From: Bekah
- 1c.
- Re: reason not to GoDaddy ??? From: Tod Hopkins
- 2a.
- Time for a new Airport? From: Ken
- 2b.
- Re: Time for a new Airport? From: Arjun Singhal
- 2c.
- Re: Time for a new Airport? From: Jim Saklad
- 2d.
- Re: Time for a new Airport? From: paul smith
- 2e.
- Re: Time for a new Airport? From: Otto Nikolaus
- 3.1.
- Re: Looking for an alternative to Address Book and iCal From: Larson
- 4a.
- Re: No Sound with HDMI? From: Jim Saklad
- 4b.
- Re: No Sound with HDMI? From: Chris Jones
- 4c.
- Re: No Sound with HDMI? From: Michael P. Stupinski
- 5a.
- Re: Apple ID problem From: pat412255
- 5b.
- Re: Apple ID problem From: John Engberg
- 5c.
- ignore conversation in Mac Mail? From: Jim McGarvie
- 5d.
- Re: ignore conversation in Mac Mail? From: Forrest Leedy
- 5e.
- Re: ignore conversation in Mac Mail? From: Jim McGarvie
- 5f.
- Re: ignore conversation in Mac Mail? From: Forrest Leedy
- 5g.
- Re: ignore conversation in Mac Mail? From: Jim Saklad
- 5h.
- Re: ignore conversation in Mac Mail? From: Jim McGarvie
- 5i.
- Re: ignore conversation in Mac Mail? From: Jim McGarvie
- 6a.
- Blowout quarter for Apple From: Michel Munger
- 6b.
- Re: Blowout quarter for Apple From: Tim O'Donoghue
- 6c.
- Re: Blowout quarter for Apple From: Otto Nikolaus
- 7.
- Android Phone Photos to MacBookPro From: Doris
Messages
- 1a.
-
Re: reason not to GoDaddy ???
Posted by: "Daly Jessup" jessup@san.rr.com
Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:19 am (PST)
On Jan 23, 2012, at 9:29 PM, Randy B. Singer wrote:
> I used GoDaddy for many years, and they seemed to be fine. But their
> support sucked. They also nearly gave away my domain name to someone
> else (which almost caused me to expectorate an internal organ in
> anger), and have some onerous policies that I really didn't like.
>
> So now I use this service that I arrived at by doing a bunch of
> research. They are inexpensive, offer a ton of bells and whistles,
> and have truly amazing 24/7 support via e-mail that is unmatched:
>
> ICDSoft
> http://icdsoft.com/
> http://www2.icdsoft.com/ hosting.php
>
> For the amazing price of $72/year I get a huge amount of Web space,
> unlimited e-mail addresses and e-mail hosting, the facility to
> quickly and easily set up e-mail discussion lists, etc. Renewal of
> my domain name only costs $5.
Randy recommended ICDSoft years ago and I took his advice and have never regretted it. Support excellent, service flawless, and even I am able to figure out their admin pages, which is amazing.
Daly
- 1b.
-
Re: reason not to GoDaddy ???
Posted by: "Bekah" bekah0176@sbcglobal.net bekalex
Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:54 am (PST)
Looking at ICD Soft my only problem is the amount of disk space. On my Mobile Me account I'm currently using 1.3 GB with a max of 20 GB. I have lots of photos and some genealogy stuff. I think I'll be going with MacHighway but I'm using WordPress for the blog.
Bekah
On Jan 24, 2012, at 5:19 AM, Daly Jessup wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2012, at 9:29 PM, Randy B. Singer wrote:
>
>> I used GoDaddy for many years, and they seemed to be fine. But their
>> support sucked. They also nearly gave away my domain name to someone
>> else (which almost caused me to expectorate an internal organ in
>> anger), and have some onerous policies that I really didn't like.
>>
>> So now I use this service that I arrived at by doing a bunch of
>> research. They are inexpensive, offer a ton of bells and whistles,
>> and have truly amazing 24/7 support via e-mail that is unmatched:
>>
>> ICDSoft
>> http://icdsoft.com/
>> http://www2.icdsoft.com/ hosting.php
>>
>> For the amazing price of $72/year I get a huge amount of Web space,
>> unlimited e-mail addresses and e-mail hosting, the facility to
>> quickly and easily set up e-mail discussion lists, etc. Renewal of
>> my domain name only costs $5.
>
>
> Randy recommended ICDSoft years ago and I took his advice and have never regretted it. Support excellent, service flawless, and even I am able to figure out their admin pages, which is amazing.
>
> Daly
>
>
>
> --------------------- --------- ------
>
> Group FAQ:
> <http://www.macsupportcentral. >com/policies/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
- 1c.
-
Re: reason not to GoDaddy ???
Posted by: "Tod Hopkins" hoplist@hillmanncarr.com todhop
Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:41 am (PST)
Not at all moot. Don't let your guard down.
tod
On Jan 23, 2012, at 8:04 PM, OBrien wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:23:41 +1100, Christopher Collins wrote:
> > Their support for SOPA?
>
> That look like it's moot, now.
>
>
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>
> O'Brien ––– –... .-. .. . -.
>
>
Tod Hopkins
Hillmann & Carr Inc.
todhopkins@hillmanncarr.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 2a.
-
Time for a new Airport?
Posted by: "Ken" avlisk@cox.net avliska
Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:31 am (PST)
Would a new Airport increase my download speed? Or, is it limited by my cable company and a new one wouldn't make a difference. My Airport Extreme is 10 or 11 years old, but works fine. It's just that with my new MacBook Air, I'm getting more buffering than I did with my old MacBook and I'm trying to figure out why.
Ken Silva
- 2b.
-
Re: Time for a new Airport?
Posted by: "Arjun Singhal" arjunsinghal@yahoo.com arjunsinghal
Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:36 am (PST)
It depends on whether the airport is slower than what your service provider gives you, in terms of bandwidth. If your airport is 11 Mbps that is 802.11b , and you have a 25 Mbps connection plugging into the ISP, you need to upgrade. However, if your ISP is like 1-2 Mbps connectivity, then any airport would do.
On 24-Jan-2012, at 7:01 PM, Ken wrote:
> Would a new Airport increase my download speed? Or, is it limited by my cable company and a new one wouldn't make a difference. My Airport Extreme is 10 or 11 years old, but works fine. It's just that with my new MacBook Air, I'm getting more buffering than I did with my old MacBook and I'm trying to figure out why.
>
> Ken Silva
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 2c.
-
Re: Time for a new Airport?
Posted by: "Jim Saklad" jimdoc@me.com jimdoc01
Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:48 am (PST)
> Would a new Airport increase my download speed? Or, is it limited by my cable company and a new one wouldn't make a difference. My Airport Extreme is 10 or 11 years old, but works fine. It's just that with my new MacBook Air, I'm getting more buffering than I did with my old MacBook and I'm trying to figure out why.
> Ken Silva
A 2001 Airport is 802.11b, which provides a *maximum* of 11 megabits per second. If your cable is better than that (my DSL is NOT), then your Wifi is throttling your speed.
Later models have *much* faster transmission, and much better encryption, and better range, among other things.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@me.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 2d.
-
Re: Time for a new Airport?
Posted by: "paul smith" kullervo@nycap.rr.com waldonny
Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:24 am (PST)
I just replaced a D-link wireless router that was about 3 years old with a refurbished Airport Extreme purchased from the Apple Store. Although both were 802.11n, my speed has increased from around 17 to 20 Mbps with the D-lonk, to around 24 to 28 Mbps with the Airport Extreme.
--
PSmith
MacBook Pro, 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4 GB DDR2 SDRAM, OS 10.7.2 iPhone 4S 64 GB, iOS 5.0.1
On Jan 24, 2012, at 10:48 AM, Jim Saklad wrote:
A 2001 Airport is 802.11b, which provides a *maximum* of 11 megabits per second. If your cable is better than that (my DSL is NOT), then your Wifi is throttling your speed.
Later models have *much* faster transmission, and much better encryption, and better range, among other things.
- 2e.
-
Re: Time for a new Airport?
Posted by: "Otto Nikolaus" otto.nikolaus@googlemail.com nikyzf
Tue Jan 24, 2012 4:08 pm (PST)
Interesting, but what is the nominal speed of your internet connection?
Or is this speed *within* your own network?
Otto
On 24 January 2012 19:24, paul smith <kullervo@nycap.rr.com > wrote:
> I just replaced a D-link wireless router that was about 3 years old with a
> refurbished Airport Extreme purchased from the Apple Store. Although both
> were 802.11n, my speed has increased from around 17 to 20 Mbps with the
> D-lonk, to around 24 to 28 Mbps with the Airport Extreme.
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 3.1.
-
Re: Looking for an alternative to Address Book and iCal
Posted by: "Larson" pix@maksimo.de yovard@ymail.com
Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:26 am (PST)
On 24.01.2012, at 07:27, N.A. Nada wrote:
>
> How does giving away Address Book or iCal, cause you to buy a complimentary good?
Not the buying of complementary goods is the issue, rather saving money is my point. I think I posted a wrong link. Sorry about that, Brent.
>
> you never told me what you paid for Address Book and iCal.
Software development cost money. I paid 2100 Euro for my MacBook Pro which, by the way, is about 3 or 4 times more than I would have paid for a good Windows-laptop here. If my MBP had shipped without those low quality products the probability that Apple might have lowered the price as much as 100 Euro seems reasonable. With that money I could have bought something decent (for example Contactizer Pro) instead of this junk.
End of discussion
(as far as I am concerned).
Anna
- 4a.
-
Re: No Sound with HDMI?
Posted by: "Jim Saklad" jimdoc@me.com jimdoc01
Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:34 am (PST)
> As far as I am aware, none of the ports on your 2008 MBP (I have the same) support sending video and audio, so you are going to have to merge these somewhere along the line.
Well, you can do Wifi to an Apple TV....
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@me.com
- 4b.
-
Re: No Sound with HDMI?
Posted by: "Chris Jones" jonesc@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk bobstermcbob
Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:49 am (PST)
On 24/01/12 14:34, Jim Saklad wrote:
>> As far as I am aware, none of the ports on your 2008 MBP (I have the same) support sending video and audio, so you are going to have to merge these somewhere along the line.
>
> Well, you can do Wifi to an Apple TV....
True, but that is not the same as connecting up your TV directly, as if
it where a second (or primary) monitor, which I got the impression was
more what the OP was looking for.
Chris
- 4c.
-
Re: No Sound with HDMI?
Posted by: "Michael P. Stupinski" mpstupinski@snet.net mstupinski
Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:10 am (PST)
You're correct on that, Chris, but Jim's suggestion is a good one. I
have been considering an ATV at some point in the future, but it will
have to be an HDMI cable plus an audio cable for now.
........Mike
On Jan 24, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Chris Jones wrote:
> On 24/01/12 14:34, Jim Saklad wrote:
>>> As far as I am aware, none of the ports on your 2008 MBP (I have
>>> the same) support sending video and audio, so you are going to
>>> have to merge these somewhere along the line.
>>
>> Well, you can do Wifi to an Apple TV....
>
> True, but that is not the same as connecting up your TV directly, as
> if
> it where a second (or primary) monitor, which I got the impression was
> more what the OP was looking for.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> --------------------- --------- ------
>
> Group FAQ:
> <http://www.macsupportcentral. >com/policies/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
- 5a.
-
Re: Apple ID problem
Posted by: "pat412255" pat412@mac.com pat412255
Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:41 am (PST)
The name of the account is displayed & you input the password associated with that account.
--- In macsupportcentral@yahoogroups. , Daly Jessup <jessup@...> wrote:com
>
> On Jan 23, 2012, at 5:42 PM, John Engberg wrote:
>
> > On Jan 23, 2012, at 7:31 PM, Oneal Neumann wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I‚m having a tough time establishing an ID with iTunes.
> >>
> > Create a new account in iTunes. It will relieve your frustration and anxiety - and it will work.
> >
> > John Engberg
>
>
> But then how do you do updates to apps you downloaded under a different ID?
>
> Daly
>
- 5b.
-
Re: Apple ID problem
Posted by: "John Engberg" mrbyte@earthlink.net mrbyte
Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:49 am (PST)
On Jan 24, 2012, at 9:41 AM, pat412255 wrote:
>
> The name of the account is displayed & you input the password associated with that account.
>
> --- In macsupportcentral@yahoogroups. , Daly Jessup <jessup@...> wrote:com
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2012, at 5:42 PM, John Engberg wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 23, 2012, at 7:31 PM, Oneal Neumann wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I‚m having a tough time establishing an ID with iTunes.
>>>>
>>> Create a new account in iTunes. It will relieve your frustration and anxiety - and it will work.
>>>
>>> John Engberg
>>
>>
>> But then how do you do updates to apps you downloaded under a different ID?
>>
>> Daly
>>
>
The answer to Daly's question is: you don't with the new ID. That's part of the whole ID/password problem. "East is East and West, and neer the twain shall meet." There is no way to sync the various ID/PWs you have. Apple really needs to do something about that.
Actually, the way I've had to do it was by opening the app and doing the update from there, but that doesn't pertain to iTunes. I don't see a problem there; but, then, I haven't had an ID/PW problem with them, either.
- 5c.
-
ignore conversation in Mac Mail?
Posted by: "Jim McGarvie" jim@mcgarvie.us jgarv2002
Tue Jan 24, 2012 9:33 am (PST)
Outlook has a feature that supposedly allows one to ignore future messages in a conversation (I say "supposedly" because it didn't seem to work that well for me). Does Mac Mail have a similar feature (preferably one that works)?
Thanks.
Jim
- 5d.
-
Re: ignore conversation in Mac Mail?
Posted by: "Forrest Leedy" f.leedy@comcast.net forrkazu
Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:36 am (PST)
On Jan 24, 2012, at 12:33 PM, Jim McGarvie wrote:
> Outlook has a feature that supposedly allows one to ignore future messages in a conversation (I say "supposedly" because it didn't seem to work that well for me). Does Mac Mail have a similar feature (preferably one that works)?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jim
Please define "ignore future messages in a conversation". Are we talking about junk mail?
Forrest
- 5e.
-
Re: ignore conversation in Mac Mail?
Posted by: "Jim McGarvie" jim@mcgarvie.us jgarv2002
Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:45 am (PST)
Nope, not necessarily junk mail. Just conversations I don't care to follow. If they could be "ignored" (sent straight to trash) I would be saved the bother of deleting them all.
On Jan 24, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Forrest Leedy wrote:
>
> On Jan 24, 2012, at 12:33 PM, Jim McGarvie wrote:
>
>> Outlook has a feature that supposedly allows one to ignore future messages in a conversation (I say "supposedly" because it didn't seem to work that well for me). Does Mac Mail have a similar feature (preferably one that works)?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Jim
>
> Please define "ignore future messages in a conversation". Are we talking about junk mail?
>
> Forrest
>
> --------------------- --------- ------
>
> Group FAQ:
> <http://www.macsupportcentral. >com/policies/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
- 5f.
-
Re: ignore conversation in Mac Mail?
Posted by: "Forrest Leedy" f.leedy@comcast.net forrkazu
Tue Jan 24, 2012 12:03 pm (PST)
Well, this sort of sounds complicated to me as you are trying restrict mail that contains certain content. This can be done through the "rules" section of email preferences. However, I would guess that Outlook has the same ability, but since I have never used this program, I cannot address what it can or cannot do. I can tell you that setting up a rule in Mail to address certain content within a email can be tricky, but it can be done. What I would fear though is that you might delete an email that you really did not want to.
If this is a real problem that is repeated by several of your contacts, I would first let them know that you are not interested in getting these emails. If they cared about you at all, they would cease sending you this stuff. If they did not stop, I would question their friendship.
One thing that you can do is route this mail to a folder that you created in email and check to see if there is other material in the email that you might want to read. At least I would start this way and if you find that none of it is what you want to see, then you can edit the rule to point blank delete it.
Now with what I said above, it is a all or none situation. If in fact though, you just want to edit out some lines in the email and retain the rest of it, I know of no program that will do that.
Forrest
On Jan 24, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Jim McGarvie wrote:
> Nope, not necessarily junk mail. Just conversations I don't care to follow. If they could be "ignored" (sent straight to trash) I would be saved the bother of deleting them all.
>
>
> On Jan 24, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Forrest Leedy wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 24, 2012, at 12:33 PM, Jim McGarvie wrote:
>>
>>> Outlook has a feature that supposedly allows one to ignore future messages in a conversation (I say "supposedly" because it didn't seem to work that well for me). Does Mac Mail have a similar feature (preferably one that works)?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Jim
>>
>> Please define "ignore future messages in a conversation". Are we talking about junk mail?
>>
>> Forrest
>>
>
- 5g.
-
Re: ignore conversation in Mac Mail?
Posted by: "Jim Saklad" jimdoc@me.com jimdoc01
Tue Jan 24, 2012 12:08 pm (PST)
> Nope, not necessarily junk mail. Just conversations I don't care to follow. If they could be "ignored" (sent straight to trash) I would be saved the bother of deleting them all.
Whether it decides what is in the "conversation" by means of Subject header or by the internal thread ID, topic drift means that rejecting all future messages in some conversations will completely ignore some other conversations (inappropriately inserted without changing the subject or thread ID) as well.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@me.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 5h.
-
Re: ignore conversation in Mac Mail?
Posted by: "Jim McGarvie" jim@mcgarvie.us jgarv2002
Tue Jan 24, 2012 12:39 pm (PST)
Thanks for all the thought you have put into this, Forrest. I appreciate it!
These messages aren't from friends. I belong to several e-mail lists--like this one--and receive a bunch of messages from each every day. I wouldn't need to look for content in the message. I would just use the subject, just as Mail does when you "Organize by conversation." I guess I could create a new rule to ignore each such conversation, but that seems a little awkward.
It is not that important. I was just hoping Mac Mail had the ability built-in, as does Outlook, and I had simply overlooked it. Guess not.
Best,
Jim
On Jan 24, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Forrest Leedy wrote:
> Well, this sort of sounds complicated to me as you are trying restrict mail that contains certain content. This can be done through the "rules" section of email preferences. However, I would guess that Outlook has the same ability, but since I have never used this program, I cannot address what it can or cannot do. I can tell you that setting up a rule in Mail to address certain content within a email can be tricky, but it can be done. What I would fear though is that you might delete an email that you really did not want to.
>
> If this is a real problem that is repeated by several of your contacts, I would first let them know that you are not interested in getting these emails. If they cared about you at all, they would cease sending you this stuff. If they did not stop, I would question their friendship.
>
> One thing that you can do is route this mail to a folder that you created in email and check to see if there is other material in the email that you might want to read. At least I would start this way and if you find that none of it is what you want to see, then you can edit the rule to point blank delete it.
>
> Now with what I said above, it is a all or none situation. If in fact though, you just want to edit out some lines in the email and retain the rest of it, I know of no program that will do that.
>
> Forrest
>
> On Jan 24, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Jim McGarvie wrote:
>
>> Nope, not necessarily junk mail. Just conversations I don't care to follow. If they could be "ignored" (sent straight to trash) I would be saved the bother of deleting them all.
>>
>>
>> On Jan 24, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Forrest Leedy wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 24, 2012, at 12:33 PM, Jim McGarvie wrote:
>>>
>>>> Outlook has a feature that supposedly allows one to ignore future messages in a conversation (I say "supposedly" because it didn't seem to work that well for me). Does Mac Mail have a similar feature (preferably one that works)?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Jim
>>>
>>> Please define "ignore future messages in a conversation". Are we talking about junk mail?
>>>
>>> Forrest
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --------------------- --------- ------
>
> Group FAQ:
> <http://www.macsupportcentral. >com/policies/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
- 5i.
-
Re: ignore conversation in Mac Mail?
Posted by: "Jim McGarvie" jim@mcgarvie.us jgarv2002
Tue Jan 24, 2012 12:41 pm (PST)
Good point, Jim. But I value my time too much to look at every message, the subject of which I am not interested in, to see if the content of the conversation has changed but not the subject header. If people don't update the subject--and I know often they don't--I guess I'll just miss it.
On Jan 24, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Jim Saklad wrote:
> > Nope, not necessarily junk mail. Just conversations I don't care to follow. If they could be "ignored" (sent straight to trash) I would be saved the bother of deleting them all.
>
> Whether it decides what is in the "conversation" by means of Subject header or by the internal thread ID, topic drift means that rejecting all future messages in some conversations will completely ignore some other conversations (inappropriately inserted without changing the subject or thread ID) as well.
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
> Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@me.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 6a.
-
Blowout quarter for Apple
Posted by: "Michel Munger" michel@macsupportcentral.com mmungermtl
Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:34 pm (PST)
Hi everyone,
Check out Apple's first quarter:
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/ 2012/01/24Apple- Reports-First- Quarter-Results. html
Plenty of impressive numbers, including 5 million Macs sold.
Michel
Sent from my iPhone
- 6b.
-
Re: Blowout quarter for Apple
Posted by: "Tim O'Donoghue" tjod@drizzle.net timodonoghue
Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:39 pm (PST)
What's even more impressive is that as those numbers went up, PC sales were dropping.
On Jan 24, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Michel Munger wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Check out Apple's first quarter:
>
> http://www.apple.com/pr/library/ 2012/01/24Apple- Reports-First- Quarter-Results. html
>
> Plenty of impressive numbers, including 5 million Macs sold.
>
> Michel
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> --------------------- --------- ------
>
> Group FAQ:
> <http://www.macsupportcentral. >com/policies/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
- 6c.
-
Re: Blowout quarter for Apple
Posted by: "Otto Nikolaus" otto.nikolaus@googlemail.com nikyzf
Tue Jan 24, 2012 4:24 pm (PST)
Has anyone else noticed that if laptops are seen in a factual/science TV
programme (UK on BB2/4 and C4), they seem increasingly to be
MacBooks/MacBook Pros? iPads seem to be everywhere too, and all this
despite the higher price compared with the "competition". Is this product
placement?
Otto
On 24 January 2012 23:39, Tim O'Donoghue <tjod@drizzle.net > wrote:
> What's even more impressive is that as those numbers went up, PC sales
> were dropping.
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 7.
-
Android Phone Photos to MacBookPro
Posted by: "Doris" untoldexpressions@gmail.com untoldexpressions
Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:52 pm (PST)
Hi,
I used to be able to connect my Android Vortex to my MacBookPro and get my
photos taken on the phone. I would have to go into folders and copy them -
no problem. Now however when I connect the phone to the computer it is not
recognized. How can I get my computer to recognize my phone again?
Thanks,
Doris
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Need to Reply?
Click one of the "Reply" links to respond to a specific message in the Daily Digest.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Individual | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
