12/07/2011

[macsupport] Digest Number 8605

Mac Support Central

Messages In This Digest (25 Messages)

1a.
Re: camera-card file-retrieval app From: Jurgen Richter
1b.
Re: camera-card file-retrieval app From: Oneal Neumann
2a.
Re: Mac DVD Ripper Pro From: Terry Pogue
2b.
Re: Mac DVD Ripper Pro From: Harry Flaxman
2c.
Re: Mac DVD Ripper Pro From: Tod Hopkins
2d.
Re: Mac DVD Ripper Pro From: Terry Pogue
2e.
Re: Mac DVD Ripper Pro From: HAL9000
3a.
Projecting from the iPhone and iPad From: Earle Jones
3b.
Re: Projecting from the iPhone and iPad From: Arjun Singhal
4a.
Re: Avoiding "Dog" Mac Models From: Tod Hopkins
4b.
Re: Avoiding "Dog" Mac Models From: Otto Nikolaus
4c.
Re: Avoiding "Dog" Mac Models From: Eric
4d.
Re: Avoiding "Dog" Mac Models From: Harry Flaxman
4e.
Re: Avoiding "Dog" Mac Models From: Harry Flaxman
4f.
Re: Avoiding "Dog" Mac Models From: Daly Jessup
4g.
Re: Avoiding "Dog" Mac Models From: paul smith
5a.
Re: Questions for Giving my MBP to a friend for Christmas? From: Tod Hopkins
6a.
Re: Looking to Purchase Windows 7 for my MBPro - Which One Though? From: Nick Andriash
6b.
Re: Looking to Purchase Windows 7 for my MBPro - Which One Though? From: Tim O'Donoghue
6c.
Re: Looking to Purchase Windows 7 for my MBPro - Which One Though? From: Nick Andriash
7a.
Internet Security Threat for Those Using Win 7 and Parallels Desktop From: Nick Andriash
7b.
Re: Internet Security Threat for Those Using Win 7 and Parallels Des From: Tim O'Donoghue
7c.
Re: Internet Security Threat for Those Using Win 7 and Parallels Des From: Nick Andriash
7d.
Re: Internet Security Threat for Those Using Win 7 and Parallels Des From: Tim O'Donoghue
7e.
Re: Internet Security Threat for Those Using Win 7 and Parallels Des From: Randy B. Singer

Messages

1a.

Re: camera-card file-retrieval app

Posted by: "Jurgen Richter" yahoo-1@sympatico.ca   epsongroups

Wed Dec 7, 2011 7:07 am (PST)



Another one is CardRaider from
http://www.ecamm.com/mac/

I use some of their other programs, so I am hopeful that this app also
works as well.
Free Demo and Buy Now for $19.95

At least it's worth a try. If the demo works for you, then $20 is worth
the investment.... for next time you find you need it.

It's always worth having similar tools in the box that do the same job -
sometimes a different app will do just a bit more or better, or in this
case, recover files the other apps missed for whatever reason....

hth

1b.

Re: camera-card file-retrieval app

Posted by: "Oneal Neumann" wardell.h.s@gmail.com   newalander

Wed Dec 7, 2011 5:47 pm (PST)





On 2011 December 6 (at 00:08) Andrew Buc wrote:

No personal experience, but I'm pretty sure such an app is listed
somewhere on this site:

<http://www.imaging-resource.com>

If I seem vague, I used this site to help choose a camera in 2004 and
haven't been on it much since!

Thanx for this lead Andrew, but there was nothing usable on the website, at least based on a quick looksee of that site.

On 2011 December 6 (at 07:22) Otto Nikolaus wrote:

See this article <http://bit.ly/tG5sXm>

PhotoRec (free) is command line (Terminal) but easy to use. I tried it a
while ago and it worked really well. (I hadn't lost any photos. I
deliberately erased an SD card as a test.) Otto

That link also mentions Exif Untrasher as being able to retrieve photo files (but only if they are JPEGs), so I gave it a try as I already had it Otto.

Following the instructions, I could not get EU to work. It consistently prompted Force Quit Applications to issue 'not responding' warnings. The problem may have arisen from the fact that I have several fairly large videos on my Sony's card. I only want to recover a few photos, however.

Next step is to download PhotoRec once I return to McDonald's (for its WiFi). I have never used Terminal to set up anything, so I am a bit leery of it Otto.

On 2011 December 6 (at 08:19) Daly Jessup wrote:

My mother once lost about 200 photos from a European trip because her camera was dropped in the rain and the card ruined. I used PhotoRescue and recovered all but one of her photos. I was impressed.

<http://www.datarescue.com/photorescue>

I'm afraid I don't know anything about importing photos into a camera, though I would think you could drag photos onto the mounted card?

Oops, I just tried that with my Canon camera. I removed the card and mounted it on my Desktop. A photo dragged over to the card (in the correct folder on the card) just fine, but when I tried to view it in the camera itself, the camera didn't recognize its presence. The camera makes .jpeg files and I dragged a jpeg onto the camera. Has anyone else made this work? Daly

I might, however, consider dropping a triple sawbuck for PhotoRescue. Depends on how things go with PhotoRec. Good recommend Daly. Thanx.

As for importing photos to cameras, I seem to recall that a few Sonies back I had done just that, the difference being that the camera would (I think) actually show the imported photos. Now, my Sony acknowledges (via its photo counter) that a picture file has been imported, however it will not show that particular picture. Its message, when I try to access the imported photo, is "Cannot display file".

When I reconnect my USB camera cable to my laptop, the picture shows in my Sony's picture folder, which I always open in Finder.

I have another camera-related issue. Harkening back to previous Sonies, I used to be able to move pictures from the Sony folders to my computers Trash. That would clear the card to zero. In other words, the camera card would fully empty.

Now, moving files to my laptop's Trash only removes card access to the picture files. It does not actually clear my camera card.

To clear my camera card, I have to either use the camera to delete the photos from the card, which frees up the space occupied by the photos, or I have to use Disk Utility to empty my camera card. The latter is my choice of deletion.

Can someone explain why using Trash for photo files no longer frees up space?

Thanx for the help thus far. Oneal

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

2a.

Re: Mac DVD Ripper Pro

Posted by: "Terry Pogue" tpogue@comcast.net   terrypogue_2000

Wed Dec 7, 2011 8:57 am (PST)



I've always used Handbrake to convert DVDs to mp4. I use Mac the Ripper to copy a DVD. (just for my own back up) Handbrake runs fine for me on Snow Leopard but for some reason it won't rip the first chapter of a disc. I have to set the chapters to rip 2 thru 25. I Mac The Ripper will convert to mp4 I sure want to know it too.
Terry

On Dec 7, 2011, at 1:16 AM, HAL9000 wrote:

> I want to convert a DVD movie to mp4 file for my iPhone. I read at MDRP that the product would rip and convert to mp4, was I wrong? I seem to get the file ripped to a dvdmedia file, but no further. The ripping took a short time, gratefully, but it's of no use if it won't convert to mp4.
>
> I probably misread or misinterpreted the sales text and or the Tutorial they provide. Anyone have an explanation or a better way of ripping to MP4?
>
> That actually works?
>
> John R
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Group FAQ:
> <http://www.macsupportcentral.com/policies/>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

2b.

Re: Mac DVD Ripper Pro

Posted by: "Harry Flaxman" harry.flaxman@comcast.net   hflaxman001

Wed Dec 7, 2011 9:15 am (PST)



On Dec 7, 2011, at 5:15 AM, HAL9000 wrote:
> There is this tiny button that I missed in the Handbrake menu when I chose rip to MP4. For some reason I have to select "iPod 5G Support" despite choosing MP4 previously.
>
> I guess I wasted my money on Mac DVD Ripper Pro. I never could figure out how to get a playable mp4 file for my iPhone by using MDRP3.
>
> Another school of hard knock lesson. I've earned a graduate degree in SHKL overtime. jr

The really expensive way out of this is to buy Toast, by Roxio. I have it, an old version, and it burns DVDs from .h264 files or any type of video file, .avi…etc.

Harry

Harry Flaxman
harry.flaxman@comcast.net

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

2c.

Re: Mac DVD Ripper Pro

Posted by: "Tod Hopkins" hoplist@hillmanncarr.com   todhop

Wed Dec 7, 2011 10:59 am (PST)



Most of the time you can simply change the extension from MV4 to MP4. MV4 is simply Apple's name for it's device specific version of MP4. In other words, MV4 is a subset of MP4 and totally compatible.

tod

On Dec 7, 2011, at 1:22 AM, HAL9000 wrote:

> I used Handbrake and got an mv4 file, but I want mp4. What converts to mp4 successfully? jr
>
> --- In macsupportcentral@yahoogroups.com, "HAL9000" <jrswebhome@...> wrote:
> >
> > I want to convert a DVD movie to mp4 file for my iPhone. I read at MDRP that the product would rip and convert to mp4, was I wrong? I seem to get the file ripped to a dvdmedia file, but no further. The ripping took a short time, gratefully, but it's of no use if it won't convert to mp4.
> >
> > I probably misread or misinterpreted the sales text and or the Tutorial they provide. Anyone have an explanation or a better way of ripping to MP4?
> >
> > That actually works?
> >
> > John R
> >
>
>

Tod Hopkins
Hillmann & Carr Inc.
todhopkins@hillmanncarr.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

2d.

Re: Mac DVD Ripper Pro

Posted by: "Terry Pogue" tpogue@comcast.net   terrypogue_2000

Wed Dec 7, 2011 12:27 pm (PST)



Ops, excuse me I used to use Mac the Ripper but now use DVD CLONER for Mac.

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 7, 2011, at 11:57 AM, Terry Pogue <tpogue@comcast.net> wrote:

> I've always used Handbrake to convert DVDs to mp4. I use Mac the Ripper to copy a DVD. (just for my own back up) Handbrake runs fine for me on Snow Leopard but for some reason it won't rip the first chapter of a disc. I have to set the chapters to rip 2 thru 25. I Mac The Ripper will convert to mp4 I sure want to know it too.
> Terry
>
> On Dec 7, 2011, at 1:16 AM, HAL9000 wrote:
>
>> I want to convert a DVD movie to mp4 file for my iPhone. I read at MDRP that the product would rip and convert to mp4, was I wrong? I seem to get the file ripped to a dvdmedia file, but no further. The ripping took a short time, gratefully, but it's of no use if it won't convert to mp4.
>>
>> I probably misread or misinterpreted the sales text and or the Tutorial they provide. Anyone have an explanation or a better way of ripping to MP4?
>>
>> That actually works?
>>
>> John R
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Group FAQ:
>> <http://www.macsupportcentral.com/policies/>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Group FAQ:
> <http://www.macsupportcentral.com/policies/>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

2e.

Re: Mac DVD Ripper Pro

Posted by: "HAL9000" jrswebhome@yahoo.com   jrswebhome

Wed Dec 7, 2011 4:47 pm (PST)



iTunes would not recognized the converted mv4 file, so I could not "add to library." I should have tried the extension rename to mp4, but didn't. Thanks everyone. jr

--- In macsupportcentral@yahoogroups.com, Tod Hopkins <hoplist@...> wrote:
>
> Most of the time you can simply change the extension from MV4 to MP4. MV4 is simply Apple's name for it's device specific version of MP4. In other words, MV4 is a subset of MP4 and totally compatible.
>
> tod
>
> On Dec 7, 2011, at 1:22 AM, HAL9000 wrote:
>
> > I used Handbrake and got an mv4 file, but I want mp4. What converts to mp4 successfully? jr
> >
> > --- In macsupportcentral@yahoogroups.com, "HAL9000" <jrswebhome@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I want to convert a DVD movie to mp4 file for my iPhone. I read at MDRP that the product would rip and convert to mp4, was I wrong? I seem to get the file ripped to a dvdmedia file, but no further. The ripping took a short time, gratefully, but it's of no use if it won't convert to mp4.
> > >
> > > I probably misread or misinterpreted the sales text and or the Tutorial they provide. Anyone have an explanation or a better way of ripping to MP4?
> > >
> > > That actually works?
> > >
> > > John R
> > >
> >
> >
>
> Tod Hopkins
> Hillmann & Carr Inc.
> todhopkins@...
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

3a.

Projecting from the iPhone and iPad

Posted by: "Earle Jones" earle.jones@comcast.net   earlejones501

Wed Dec 7, 2011 9:58 am (PST)



*
Question: I live in a retirement community (about 300 people in about 200 apartments.)

We give Mac demos and lessons to try to increase appreciation of the Mac platform. For this, we use a standard digital projector which works very well.

We also have a series on the iPhone and iPad. Is there a way to connect the iPhone or iPad to the projector for such classes? It would be much more convenient to project the iPhone and iPad screen. More people could appreciate our demos.

Many thanks!

earle
*
_______________________
Earle Jones 
501 Portola Road #8008
Portola Valley CA 94028
Home: 650-424-4362
Cell: 650-269-0035
earle.jones@comcast.net

3b.

Re: Projecting from the iPhone and iPad

Posted by: "Arjun Singhal" arjunsinghal@yahoo.com   arjunsinghal

Wed Dec 7, 2011 10:12 am (PST)



The iPad 2 can connect via VGA on to a projector and you can use screen mirroring. I think it can connect via Airplay as well using the Apple TV 2. The iPad first generation only shows Keynote on a projector or applications that support mirroring through the interface. Airplay mirroring is not supported on the iPad 1.

I am getting a little jittery, because I own the first generation iPad so I'm looking for someone to confirm what I am saying. Sorry if I am wrong here. Was just trying to provide my two pieces.

On 07-Dec-2011, at 11:28 PM, Earle Jones wrote:

> *
> Question: I live in a retirement community (about 300 people in about 200 apartments.)
>
> We give Mac demos and lessons to try to increase appreciation of the Mac platform. For this, we use a standard digital projector which works very well.
>
> We also have a series on the iPhone and iPad. Is there a way to connect the iPhone or iPad to the projector for such classes? It would be much more convenient to project the iPhone and iPad screen. More people could appreciate our demos.
>
> Many thanks!
>
> earle
> *
> _______________________
> Earle Jones 
> 501 Portola Road #8008
> Portola Valley CA 94028
> Home: 650-424-4362
> Cell: 650-269-0035
> earle.jones@comcast.net
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

4a.

Re: Avoiding "Dog" Mac Models

Posted by: "Tod Hopkins" hoplist@hillmanncarr.com   todhop

Wed Dec 7, 2011 10:48 am (PST)



If you can stand being limited to 10.4, I would have recommended the G5 Quad. The fastest G5 made and the end of the line. But since you don't like (I also replaced a PS in one of these), then move to Intel machines. As far as I know, little has changed in the towers since the move to Intel, but you might skip the first year just on general principal, and make sure you don't get stuck with 10.4. If you can get a G5 cheap though, find a second dead one for parts. Just make sure it has a good PS.

As for MBP, I love the 15" 2008 (early or late). Last version to have the "old" port config, which I prefer. DVI out, FW400, USB ports on both sides... expresscard slot not so useful anymore, but made it makes it popular among pros with older card readers. Also has the multi-touch pad WITH button! I hate the integrated button, even though I use tapping 95% of the time. And DYI upgrades easier. Unfortunately, it is popular with others too, and the price has stayed high. Last I checked, a "refurb" quality late-2008 was still $900.

And finally, get the "MacTracker" application to give you spec and performance details on ever possible config. Never buy anything used without checking MacTracker.

Cheers,
tod

On Dec 5, 2011, at 3:42 PM, Eric wrote:

> My wife and I are moving to the other side of the planet next year and we need upgraded Macs from our present models; she has a Powerbook 12" 1ghz and I am limping along with a dog of a 2.0 G5 tower.
>
> My wife is happy with her G4 but for anyone else stuck and unable to upgrade beyond 10.5.8, you know what issues are going on there and will only get worse. So to keep current with browsing, she'll be wanting an intel laptop, and I'm directing her towards the 13" Macbook Pro line.
>
> I've had 2 of these G5's and both were dogs. The first one's power supply died and the 2nd one that I'm using now has issues with audio, Quicktime and pretty much any video playback. iTunes will stop spontaneously, will also do so whenever I use another app while playing something in itunes, namely songs, etc, etc. My travails are well documented in posts in this group if one cares to read them. Since it hasn't caught on fire yet, I'll tolerate it's problems till I can get some flavor of a Mac Pro.
>
> We'll be buying used units, as we can't afford new so my question is, of the Macbook Pro line, is there one model that stands out as a good performer? I'm open to any model, but will probably stick to the 13" size as my wife likes that.
> The same question applies to the Mac Pro's as to which one/s do well or have a poor track record. Also is there a site that has info like this? I've already googled
> "best mac models",
> "mac performance guide",
> "mac quality guide",
> "mac dependability guide/chart" and appledefects.com is a non-site now w/no new posts since '09.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Eric
>
>

Tod Hopkins
Hillmann & Carr Inc.
todhopkins@hillmanncarr.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

4b.

Re: Avoiding "Dog" Mac Models

Posted by: "Otto Nikolaus" otto.nikolaus@googlemail.com   nikyzf

Wed Dec 7, 2011 11:21 am (PST)



Any G5 will, of course, run 10.5.

Otto

On 7 December 2011 18:48, Tod Hopkins <hoplist@hillmanncarr.com> wrote:

> If you can stand being limited to 10.4, I would have recommended the G5
> Quad. The fastest G5 made and the end of the line. But since you don't
> like (I also replaced a PS in one of these), then move to Intel machines.
> As far as I know, little has changed in the towers since the move to
> Intel, but you might skip the first year just on general principal, and
> make sure you don't get stuck with 10.4. If you can get a G5 cheap though,
> find a second dead one for parts. Just make sure it has a good PS.
>
> As for MBP, I love the 15" 2008 (early or late). Last version to have the
> "old" port config, which I prefer. DVI out, FW400, USB ports on both
> sides... expresscard slot not so useful anymore, but made it makes it
> popular among pros with older card readers. Also has the multi-touch pad
> WITH button! I hate the integrated button, even though I use tapping 95%
> of the time. And DYI upgrades easier. Unfortunately, it is popular with
> others too, and the price has stayed high. Last I checked, a "refurb"
> quality late-2008 was still $900.
>
> And finally, get the "MacTracker" application to give you spec and
> performance details on ever possible config. Never buy anything used
> without checking MacTracker.
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

4c.

Re: Avoiding "Dog" Mac Models

Posted by: "Eric" emanmb@yahoo.com   emanmb

Wed Dec 7, 2011 4:39 pm (PST)



Thanks Tod.
MacTracker is a good idea as referring back to everymac.com all the time is a pain.
Eric

--- In macsupportcentral@yahoogroups.com, Tod Hopkins <hoplist@...> wrote:
>
> If you can stand being limited to 10.4, I would have recommended the G5 Quad. The fastest G5 made and the end of the line. But since you don't like (I also replaced a PS in one of these), then move to Intel machines. As far as I know, little has changed in the towers since the move to Intel, but you might skip the first year just on general principal, and make sure you don't get stuck with 10.4. If you can get a G5 cheap though, find a second dead one for parts. Just make sure it has a good PS.
>
> As for MBP, I love the 15" 2008 (early or late). Last version to have the "old" port config, which I prefer. DVI out, FW400, USB ports on both sides... expresscard slot not so useful anymore, but made it makes it popular among pros with older card readers. Also has the multi-touch pad WITH button! I hate the integrated button, even though I use tapping 95% of the time. And DYI upgrades easier. Unfortunately, it is popular with others too, and the price has stayed high. Last I checked, a "refurb" quality late-2008 was still $900.
>
> And finally, get the "MacTracker" application to give you spec and performance details on ever possible config. Never buy anything used without checking MacTracker.
>
> Cheers,
> tod
>

4d.

Re: Avoiding "Dog" Mac Models

Posted by: "Harry Flaxman" harry.flaxman@comcast.net   hflaxman001

Wed Dec 7, 2011 6:14 pm (PST)



On Dec 7, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Tod Hopkins wrote:
> If you can stand being limited to 10.4, I would have recommended the G5 Quad.

G5 Quad?? I had a PowerMac G5, top of the line available at the time, but it was not a quad.

Where do you see this listed in Apple's history?

Harry

Harry Flaxman
harry.flaxman@comcast.net

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

4e.

Re: Avoiding "Dog" Mac Models

Posted by: "Harry Flaxman" harry.flaxman@comcast.net   hflaxman001

Wed Dec 7, 2011 6:15 pm (PST)



On Dec 7, 2011, at 9:14 PM, Harry Flaxman wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Tod Hopkins wrote:
>> If you can stand being limited to 10.4, I would have recommended the G5 Quad.
>
>
> G5 Quad?? I had a PowerMac G5, top of the line available at the time, but it was not a quad.
>
> Where do you see this listed in Apple's history?

My mistake. Just found it.

Harry

Harry Flaxman
harry.flaxman@comcast.net

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

4f.

Re: Avoiding "Dog" Mac Models

Posted by: "Daly Jessup" jessup@san.rr.com

Wed Dec 7, 2011 7:20 pm (PST)



On Dec 7, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Tod Hopkins wrote:

> If you can stand being limited to 10.4, I would have recommended the G5 Quad. The fastest G5 made and the end of the line. But since you don't like (I also replaced a PS in one of these), then move to Intel machines. As far as I know, little has changed in the towers since the move to Intel, but you might skip the first year just on general principal, and make sure you don't get stuck with 10.4. If you can get a G5 cheap though, find a second dead one for parts. Just make sure it has a good PS.

Good post, but what is a "PS"?

Daly
4g.

Re: Avoiding "Dog" Mac Models

Posted by: "paul smith" kullervo@nycap.rr.com   waldonny

Wed Dec 7, 2011 7:31 pm (PST)



In this context, Power Supply.
--
PSmith
MacBook Pro, 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4 GB DDR2 SDRAM, OS 10.7.2 iPhone 4S 64 GB, iOS 5.0.1

On Dec 7, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Daly Jessup wrote:

Good post, but what is a "PS"?

5a.

Re: Questions for Giving my MBP to a friend for Christmas?

Posted by: "Tod Hopkins" hoplist@hillmanncarr.com   todhop

Wed Dec 7, 2011 10:52 am (PST)



Personally, I prefer to "rebuild" from scratch. It's a good opportunity to rethink all those "ruts" you did not even know you were in and you'll get better performance from fresh installs. It's amazing how much customizing you have done that you don't remember.

tod

On Dec 6, 2011, at 12:56 PM, harpangel36 wrote:

> I have backed up everything on my old MBP with TM on an external hard drive. Would it be feasible to transfer to my new MBP using restore on the applications I have? Some like photoshop elements are not one I can just re-install from the app store.
>
> --- In macsupportcentral@yahoogroups.com, "harpangel36" <harpangel36@...> wrote:
> >
> > I will be giving my mid 2009 MBP to a good friend for Christmas and will be getting a new MBP. I am wondering a few things.
> >
> > 1.What is the best way to transfer from one MBP to another? There are some applications I don't want to transfer.
> > 2. I have VMfusion with windows 7 on my current MBP. Can I transfer that over to the new one, if I decide I still need it?
> > 3. All of the apps I have purchased, (pages, keynote, aperture, etc.) Can I leave them on for her and then reinstall from the Apple store on my new one?
> > Is there anything I should know that might be important in giving this as a gift to my friend?
> >
> > Thanks, Roxanne
> >
>
>

Tod Hopkins
Hillmann & Carr Inc.
todhopkins@hillmanncarr.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

6a.

Re: Looking to Purchase Windows 7 for my MBPro - Which One Though?

Posted by: "Nick Andriash" Nickster248@telus.net   andriash2005

Wed Dec 7, 2011 11:16 am (PST)




On 2011-12-06, at 4:27 PM, Tim O'Donoghue wrote:

> I'm sure there are pros and cons for both of these use cases. They both work for me for my intended uses. Maybe one or the other will work for you.

Thanks very much Tim...and everyone else for your help. I should have simply gone down to Future Shop and bought a boxed copy of Windows 7 Home Premium instead of purchasing online. Had I bought the physical disk I probably would have gone with your suggestion, but instead opted for the Win 7 installation using Parallels Desktop.

The installation was very easy and am very pleased with the results. I will however burn my ISO to a disc (although I am not sure how to do that yet) which will hopefully open up an opportunity to use Win 7 on it's own partition on my SSD. I think I might prefer that even better.

Thanks again...

Nick

--
 Nick Andriash 
andriash@telus.net
17" MacBook Pro, 2.3GHz Intel Core i7, Memory 8 GB, OS X 10.7.2
iPad2 WiFi & 3G, 64GB
iPhone4S 32GB

6b.

Re: Looking to Purchase Windows 7 for my MBPro - Which One Though?

Posted by: "Tim O'Donoghue" tjod@drizzle.net   timodonoghue

Wed Dec 7, 2011 11:26 am (PST)



Nick;

Disk Utility can burn the ISO to a DVD. Start here:

http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Mac/10.6/en/8729.html

or open Disk Utility from Applications > Utilities and search in Help.

Tim

On Dec 7, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Nick Andriash wrote:

>
> On 2011-12-06, at 4:27 PM, Tim O'Donoghue wrote:
>
>> I'm sure there are pros and cons for both of these use cases. They both work for me for my intended uses. Maybe one or the other will work for you.
>
> Thanks very much Tim...and everyone else for your help. I should have simply gone down to Future Shop and bought a boxed copy of Windows 7 Home Premium instead of purchasing online. Had I bought the physical disk I probably would have gone with your suggestion, but instead opted for the Win 7 installation using Parallels Desktop.
>
> The installation was very easy and am very pleased with the results. I will however burn my ISO to a disc (although I am not sure how to do that yet) which will hopefully open up an opportunity to use Win 7 on it's own partition on my SSD. I think I might prefer that even better.
>
> Thanks again...
>
> Nick
>
> --
>  Nick Andriash 
> andriash@telus.net
> 17" MacBook Pro, 2.3GHz Intel Core i7, Memory 8 GB, OS X 10.7.2
> iPad2 WiFi & 3G, 64GB
> iPhone4S 32GB
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Group FAQ:
> <http://www.macsupportcentral.com/policies/>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

6c.

Re: Looking to Purchase Windows 7 for my MBPro - Which One Though?

Posted by: "Nick Andriash" Nickster248@telus.net   andriash2005

Wed Dec 7, 2011 12:49 pm (PST)




On 2011-12-07, at 11:26 AM, Tim O'Donoghue wrote:

> Disk Utility can burn the ISO to a DVD. Start here:
>
> http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Mac/10.6/en/8729.html
>
> or open Disk Utility from Applications > Utilities and search in Help.

Thanks Tim... Boy, am I glad I switched to Mac earlier this year. Now that I've played with both Windows/Mac latest iterations, Mac is by far the best I've ever seen. There really is no comparison.

--
 Nick Andriash 
andriash@telus.net
17" MacBook Pro, 2.3GHz Intel Core i7, Memory 8 GB, OS X 10.7.2
iPad2 WiFi & 3G, 64GB
iPhone4S 32GB

7a.

Internet Security Threat for Those Using Win 7 and Parallels Desktop

Posted by: "Nick Andriash" Nickster248@telus.net   andriash2005

Wed Dec 7, 2011 1:01 pm (PST)



Now that I have Win 7 Home Premium and Parallels Desktop running alongside Lion, a whole new problem has arose that I admit I never thought about until now. I use Intego's Internet Security Barrier on my 2011 MacBook Pro, but now that I also have Win 7, I have left myself open to the more prevalent threat Windows 7 poses.

For those of you who are running both Win 7 and Lion, how are you protecting yourself from Internet threats. I see that Intego offers Internet Security Barrier dual protection, but I've just purchased Intego's Internet Security Barrier for my Mac last month, and I do not really want to fork out another $140 for 2 years of dual protection... but I might have to.

What are other Users doing in terms of threat protection when running Win 7 and Lion together?

--
 Nick Andriash 
andriash@telus.net
17" MacBook Pro, 2.3GHz Intel Core i7, Memory 8 GB, OS X 10.7.2
iPad2 WiFi & 3G, 64GB
iPhone4S 32GB

7b.

Re: Internet Security Threat for Those Using Win 7 and Parallels Des

Posted by: "Tim O'Donoghue" tjod@drizzle.net   timodonoghue

Wed Dec 7, 2011 1:51 pm (PST)



For VMs and Bootcamp I use Microsoft Security Essentials - MSE - is free, effective, and relatively non-intrusive.

http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/products/security-essentials

On Dec 7, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Nick Andriash wrote:

> Now that I have Win 7 Home Premium and Parallels Desktop running alongside Lion, a whole new problem has arose that I admit I never thought about until now. I use Intego's Internet Security Barrier on my 2011 MacBook Pro, but now that I also have Win 7, I have left myself open to the more prevalent threat Windows 7 poses.
>
> For those of you who are running both Win 7 and Lion, how are you protecting yourself from Internet threats. I see that Intego offers Internet Security Barrier dual protection, but I've just purchased Intego's Internet Security Barrier for my Mac last month, and I do not really want to fork out another $140 for 2 years of dual protection... but I might have to.
>
> What are other Users doing in terms of threat protection when running Win 7 and Lion together?
>
> --
>  Nick Andriash 
> andriash@telus.net
> 17" MacBook Pro, 2.3GHz Intel Core i7, Memory 8 GB, OS X 10.7.2
> iPad2 WiFi & 3G, 64GB
> iPhone4S 32GB
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Group FAQ:
> <http://www.macsupportcentral.com/policies/>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

7c.

Re: Internet Security Threat for Those Using Win 7 and Parallels Des

Posted by: "Nick Andriash" Nickster248@telus.net   andriash2005

Wed Dec 7, 2011 2:37 pm (PST)




On 2011-12-07, at 1:51 PM, Tim O'Donoghue wrote:

> For VMs and Bootcamp I use Microsoft Security Essentials - MSE - is free, effective, and relatively non-intrusive.

Problem solved by Tim O'Donoghue yet again!! :-) Thanks very much Tim. BTW, I am just on my way to buy some blank DVD's to burn that 64 bit Win 7 ISO.

--
 Nick Andriash 
andriash@telus.net
17" MacBook Pro, 2.3GHz Intel Core i7, Memory 8 GB, OS X 10.7.2
iPad2 WiFi & 3G, 64GB
iPhone4S 32GB

7d.

Re: Internet Security Threat for Those Using Win 7 and Parallels Des

Posted by: "Tim O'Donoghue" tjod@drizzle.net   timodonoghue

Wed Dec 7, 2011 5:54 pm (PST)



Happy to help, Nick. I'm very new to Mac myself and still use Windows when I have to - usually for work. For personal use - photography, flying, mapping - it's all Mac and I'm not intending to go back.

On Dec 7, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Nick Andriash wrote:

>
> On 2011-12-07, at 1:51 PM, Tim O'Donoghue wrote:
>
>> For VMs and Bootcamp I use Microsoft Security Essentials - MSE - is free, effective, and relatively non-intrusive.
>
> Problem solved by Tim O'Donoghue yet again!! :-) Thanks very much Tim. BTW, I am just on my way to buy some blank DVD's to burn that 64 bit Win 7 ISO.
>
> --
>  Nick Andriash 
> andriash@telus.net
> 17" MacBook Pro, 2.3GHz Intel Core i7, Memory 8 GB, OS X 10.7.2
> iPad2 WiFi & 3G, 64GB
> iPhone4S 32GB
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Group FAQ:
> <http://www.macsupportcentral.com/policies/>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

7e.

Re: Internet Security Threat for Those Using Win 7 and Parallels Des

Posted by: "Randy B. Singer" randy@macattorney.com   randybrucesinger

Wed Dec 7, 2011 7:57 pm (PST)




On Dec 7, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Nick Andriash wrote:

> What are other Users doing in terms of threat protection when
> running Win 7 and Lion together?

Windows running on a Macintosh is theoretically just as susceptible
to malware as a Windows PC.

But there is one big difference in using Windows in virtualization on
a Mac and using it on an actual PC, and that is that you have your
Mac partition to work with.

Most folks that I know of who are running Windows on their Mac are
doing so just to run one or two mission critical applications. They
don't use it for anything else.

Most of the nasties that a PC can get come either via e-mail or the
Web. If you don't use Windows to access the Internet, or for e-mail
(and there is no need to, since there is excellent Macintosh software
with which you can do that), you have cut off by far the biggest
vectors for Windows infection.

Now, if you are also careful about
what you install on your Windows partition from other external sources
(i.e. don't share programs or files with non-protected Windows PC's
via flash
drive), you can completely avoid any Windows malware.

So anti-virus software for Windows running on a Mac in most cases is
probably completely unnecessary.

___________________________________________
Randy B. Singer
Co-author of The Macintosh Bible (4th, 5th, and 6th editions)

Macintosh OS X Routine Maintenance
http://www.macattorney.com/ts.html
___________________________________________

Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Need traffic?

Drive customers

With search ads

on Yahoo!

Drive Traffic

Sponsored Search

can help increase

your site traffic.

Yahoo! Finance

It's Now Personal

Guides, news,

advice & more.

Need to Reply?

Click one of the "Reply" links to respond to a specific message in the Daily Digest.

Create New Topic | Visit Your Group on the Web
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.