Messages In This Digest (24 Messages)
- 1a.
- Re: Just upgraded from 3gs to 4s question---comment and another ques From: Jim Saklad
- 2a.
- Re: Secure File From: mdoyle13
- 2b.
- Re: Secure File From: DavidG
- 2c.
- Re: Secure File From: bladessf@aol.com
- 3a.
- Re: Recording lectures with an iPhone? From: Chris Laarman
- 4a.
- Re: Just upgraded from 3gs to 4s question---comment and another que From: DavidG
- 4b.
- Re: Just upgraded from 3gs to 4s question---comment and another que From: Donald
- 4c.
- Re: Just upgraded from 3gs to 4s question---comment and another que From: Moe Rubenzahl
- 5a.
- Missed SMS Tone Repeating From: Bill Boulware
- 5b.
- Re: Missed SMS Tone Repeating From: Jay Abraham
- 5c.
- address book sync From: Cochi
- 5d.
- Re: Missed SMS Tone Repeating From: Paul Deyo
- 5e.
- Re: address book sync From: Paul Deyo
- 6.1.
- Re: Question From: Jay Abraham
- 7a.
- Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction survey From: rkkeller8
- 7b.
- Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv From: Brent
- 7c.
- Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv From: me
- 7d.
- Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv From: Techlady
- 7e.
- Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv From: whiterabbit32
- 7f.
- Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv From: whiterabbit32
- 7g.
- Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv From: Moe Rubenzahl
- 7h.
- Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv From: whiterabbit32
- 7i.
- Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv From: ROGER PROKIC
- 7j.
- Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv From: whiterabbit32
Messages
- 1a.
-
Re: Just upgraded from 3gs to 4s question---comment and another ques
Posted by: "Jim Saklad" jimdoc@me.com jimdoc01
Tue Dec 6, 2011 3:01 am (PST)
>> Your "older iPhone" probably didn't have a Corning Gorilla Glass face. These are VERY resistant to scratching and to face-on impact, but still quite susceptible to edge impact, which is why a case, or at least a bumper, is generally recommended, while relatively few experienced users see a need for screen "protection".
>
> Does the 4 (not 4S) have Gorilla Glass?
> David
4 and 4S do; 3G and 3GS do not.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@me.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 2a.
-
Re: Secure File
Posted by: "mdoyle13" mickeydoyle13@gmail.com mdoyle13
Tue Dec 6, 2011 3:01 am (PST)
You could possibly use a password program like LastPass, which contains a secure notes section.
--- In apple-iphone@yahoogroups. , "ryanbweathers" <weathersinc@com ...> wrote:
>
> I have an iPhone and iPad. I am looking for a program that I can type information and keep it encrypted on the device and possibly sync with my desktop. Basically I need to keep "protected information" between 2 locations.
>
- 2b.
-
Re: Secure File
Posted by: "DavidG" dmgraham98@yahoo.com dmgraham98
Tue Dec 6, 2011 3:01 am (PST)
Try Splash ID for iOS.
dmg
--- In apple-iphone@yahoogroups. , "ryanbweathers" <weathersinc@com ...> wrote:
>
> I have an iPhone and iPad. I am looking for a program that I can type information and keep it encrypted on the device and possibly sync with my desktop. Basically I need to keep "protected information" between 2 locations.
>
- 2c.
-
Re: Secure File
Posted by: "bladessf@aol.com" bladessf@aol.com bladessf2000
Tue Dec 6, 2011 9:36 am (PST)
Hi, Use Splash ID Safe - it is a database that is encrypted on the phone and
there is a desktop companion that wirelessly syncs to move items back and
forth encrypted during transfer. I have not done documents with it but for
each record (which is fully customizable) there is a field for notes and
also ability to attach documents. Not sure how it works though as I have
not had a need to use it. Check it out.
Sue
In a message dated 12/5/2011 11:01:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
weathersinc@yahoo.com writes:
I have an iPhone and iPad. I am looking for a program that I can type
information and keep it encrypted on the device and possibly sync with my
desktop. Basically I need to keep "protected information" between 2 locations.
- 3a.
-
Re: Recording lectures with an iPhone?
Posted by: "Chris Laarman" v.c.laarman@gmail.com chrislaarman
Tue Dec 6, 2011 3:01 am (PST)
Betsy Schwartz <betsys@gmail.com > on Mon, 5 Dec 2011 22:43:56 -0500:
>When I say unattended In the past I've seen students ask to leave
>small recorders on the instructor's desk during the lecture.
Reminds me of this story. If it has ever really happened, it must be
some 40 years ago:
A professor got tired of telling his thing in front of those
uninterested students. He had a tape recorder play his prerecorded
lectures back.
After a while, he peeked to see how the students reacted. - No
students, just tape recorders...
--
Chris Laarman
- 4a.
-
Re: Just upgraded from 3gs to 4s question---comment and another que
Posted by: "DavidG" dmgraham98@yahoo.com dmgraham98
Tue Dec 6, 2011 3:01 am (PST)
Apple use Aluminosilicate Glass, simular to Corning Gorilla Glass
dmg
--- In apple-iphone@yahoogroups. , David Brostoff <listaddr@..com .> wrote:
>
> At 6:15 PM -0500 12/5/11, Jim Saklad wrote:
>
> >Your "older iPhone" probably didn't have a Corning Gorilla Glass
> >face. These are VERY resistant to scratching and to face-on impact,
> >but still quite susceptible to edge impact, which is why a case, or
> >at least a bumper, is generally recommended, while relatively few
> >experienced users see a need for screen "protection".
>
> Does the 4 (not 4S) have Gorilla Glass?
>
> David
>
- 4b.
-
Re: Just upgraded from 3gs to 4s question---comment and another que
Posted by: "Donald" xlnt74@sbcglobal.net xlnt74@sbcglobal.net
Tue Dec 6, 2011 3:01 am (PST)
---
> Does the 4 (not 4S) have Gorilla Glass?
>
>
Yes.
- 4c.
-
Re: Just upgraded from 3gs to 4s question---comment and another que
Posted by: "Moe Rubenzahl" moe6g@rubenzahl.com MRubenzahl
Tue Dec 6, 2011 4:22 am (PST)
I don't think they use that brand, but they do use a very hard glass.
I carries an iPhone 3 in my pocet without screen protector and
without babying it for years and netted two very small scratches. New
ones should be even better. My 4s has a bumper case, no screen
protection.
_____________________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
Subject: Re: [apple-iphone] Re: Just upgraded from 3gs to 4s questio
Author: David Brostoff
Date: 12/5/11 6:59 PM -0800
>
>
>At 6:15 PM -0500 12/5/11, Jim Saklad wrote:
>
>>Your "older iPhone" probably didn't have a Corning Gorilla Glass
>>face. These are VERY resistant to scratching and to face-on impact,
>>but still quite susceptible to edge impact, which is why a case, or
>>at least a bumper, is generally recommended, while relatively few
>>experienced users see a need for screen "protection".
>
>Does the 4 (not 4S) have Gorilla Glass?
>
>David
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 5a.
-
Missed SMS Tone Repeating
Posted by: "Bill Boulware" bill.boulware@gmail.com boulware0224
Tue Dec 6, 2011 7:04 am (PST)
Am I losing my mind or isn't there a setting to make the missed SMS tones
repeat every 5 minutes or something? I could have sworn this was
introduced in iOS 3.x or iOS 4.x and I can not find it to save my life.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 5b.
-
Re: Missed SMS Tone Repeating
Posted by: "Jay Abraham" jaygroups@abrahamgroup.net kerala01212001
Tue Dec 6, 2011 7:34 am (PST)
Hi Bill,
It's in the Settings:Notifications:Messages. Scroll down to bottom where it says to repeat alert,
Jay
On Dec 6, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Bill Boulware wrote:
> Am I losing my mind or isn't there a setting to make the missed SMS tones
> repeat every 5 minutes or something? I could have sworn this was
> introduced in iOS 3.x or iOS 4.x and I can not find it to save my life.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 5c.
-
address book sync
Posted by: "Cochi" cochiho3@gmail.com chihoco
Tue Dec 6, 2011 7:35 am (PST)
When I input new address data in my address book on my mac then sync to my iPhone, it doesn't transfer the new entries.
It only happened lately. Used to sync properly.
My iPhone also now has double entries of contacts. How did that happen?
Anyone have the same problem? What should I do?
Rey
- 5d.
-
Re: Missed SMS Tone Repeating
Posted by: "Paul Deyo" paul.deyo@gmail.com crewcheef
Tue Dec 6, 2011 7:36 am (PST)
settings/notification/messages
--
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com )
On Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Bill Boulware wrote:
>
> Am I losing my mind or isn't there a setting to make the missed SMS tones
> repeat every 5 minutes or something? I could have sworn this was
> introduced in iOS 3.x or iOS 4.x and I can not find it to save my life.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 5e.
-
Re: address book sync
Posted by: "Paul Deyo" paul.deyo@gmail.com crewcheef
Tue Dec 6, 2011 8:33 am (PST)
I also have double entries… and I had over 700 entries in mine.
--
Pul
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com )
On Tuesday, December 6, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Cochi wrote:
>
> When I input new address data in my address book on my mac then sync to my iPhone, it doesn't transfer the new entries.
>
> It only happened lately. Used to sync properly.
>
> My iPhone also now has double entries of contacts. How did that happen?
>
> Anyone have the same problem? What should I do?
>
> Rey
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 6.1.
-
Re: Question
Posted by: "Jay Abraham" jaygroups@abrahamgroup.net kerala01212001
Tue Dec 6, 2011 9:23 am (PST)
I believe you can sync Notes with iCloud if you have a me.com id.
Jay
On Dec 4, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Allan wrote:
> Are there any benefits?
>
> Email sent by iphone 4 👀
>
> On Dec 4, 2011, at 13:45, Jim Saklad <jimdoc@me.com> wrote:
>
> > > Is there any reason a person with an iPhone has to have a me.com ID?
> > > Allan
> >
> > No.
> >
> > Jim Saklad
- 7a.
-
Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction survey
Posted by: "rkkeller8" thekellergroup@gmail.com rkkeller8
Tue Dec 6, 2011 1:50 pm (PST)
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/ btl/consumer- reports-ranks- at-t-as-lowest- again-in- satisfaction- survey/64789? tag=nl.e589
Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction survey
By Rachel King | December 6, 2011, 9:28am PST
Summary: AT&T can't catch a break, but maybe the telecommunications provider only has itself to blame.
Once again, AT&T has proven to be somewhat of a disappointment to consumers, according to Consumer Reports.
The publication's annual satisfaction survey found that AT&T was ranked at the bottom of the major mobile carriers in the United States. Interestingly, a lesser-known provider, Consumer Cellular, proved to be the most satisfying to customers.
The survey is based upon the responses from more than 66,000 subscribers of Consumer Reports with carrier ratings for 22 metropolitan markets. Poll participants were asked to rate service and the customer support experience with both standard and no-contract cell phone providers.
When it comes to the top tier domestic mobile providers, Verizon topped the charts, and Sprint reportedly followed. T-Mobile didn't do as well, but at least it fared better than AT&T.
One could argue that AT&T can't seem to catch a break lately. First, it has encountered enormous hurdles as of late in its now beleaguered bid to buyout T-Mobile for the purpose of expanding its own 4G network, which might actually be useful to some customers.
Nevertheless, opponents such as Sprint would argue that move isn't necessary, and that AT&T needs to dig deeper to fix itself.
Based on the fact that AT&T has been at the bottom of the polls at least two years in a row, the telecommunications company really only has itself to blame at this point.
- 7b.
-
Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv
Posted by: "Brent" flapdoodle@gmail.com flapdoodle44
Tue Dec 6, 2011 1:56 pm (PST)
They sure didn't ask me. I am an AT&T fan. Service where I am and for
hundreds of miles around are better than any of the others. Service at the
AT&T store have always be outstanding also.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:50 PM, rkkeller8 <thekellergroup@gmail.com > wrote:
> **
>
>
>
> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/ btl/consumer- reports-ranks- at-t-as-lowest- again-in- satisfaction- survey/64789? tag=nl.e589
>
> Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction survey
>
> By Rachel King | December 6, 2011, 9:28am PST
>
> Summary: AT&T can't catch a break, but maybe the telecommunications
> provider only has itself to blame.
>
> Once again, AT&T has proven to be somewhat of a disappointment to
> consumers, according to Consumer Reports.
>
> The publication's annual satisfaction survey found that AT&T was ranked at
> the bottom of the major mobile carriers in the United States.
> Interestingly, a lesser-known provider, Consumer Cellular, proved to be the
> most satisfying to customers.
>
> The survey is based upon the responses from more than 66,000 subscribers
> of Consumer Reports with carrier ratings for 22 metropolitan markets. Poll
> participants were asked to rate service and the customer support experience
> with both standard and no-contract cell phone providers.
>
> When it comes to the top tier domestic mobile providers, Verizon topped
> the charts, and Sprint reportedly followed. T-Mobile didn't do as well, but
> at least it fared better than AT&T.
>
> One could argue that AT&T can't seem to catch a break lately. First, it
> has encountered enormous hurdles as of late in its now beleaguered bid to
> buyout T-Mobile for the purpose of expanding its own 4G network, which
> might actually be useful to some customers.
>
> Nevertheless, opponents such as Sprint would argue that move isn't
> necessary, and that AT&T needs to dig deeper to fix itself.
>
> Based on the fact that AT&T has been at the bottom of the polls at least
> two years in a row, the telecommunications company really only has itself
> to blame at this point.
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 7c.
-
Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv
Posted by: "me" mespahn@bellsouth.net mespahn
Tue Dec 6, 2011 5:42 pm (PST)
Same for me. This was a small survey. I have read where Sprint is having growing pains from a surge of IPhone customers and can't handle demand on data. I hardly think T-Mobile has the coverage of AT&T for that matter.
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 15:56:41 -0600, you wrote:
>They sure didn't ask me. I am an AT&T fan. Service where I am and for
>hundreds of miles around are better than any of the others. Service at the
>AT&T store have always be outstanding also.
>
>On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:50 PM, rkkeller8 <thekellergroup@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/ btl/consumer- reports-ranks- at-t-as-lowest- again-in- satisfaction- survey/64789? tag=nl.e589
>>
>> Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction survey
>>
>> By Rachel King | December 6, 2011, 9:28am PST
>>
>> Summary: AT&T can't catch a break, but maybe the telecommunications
>> provider only has itself to blame.
>>
>> Once again, AT&T has proven to be somewhat of a disappointment to
>> consumers, according to Consumer Reports.
>>
>> The publication's annual satisfaction survey found that AT&T was ranked at
>> the bottom of the major mobile carriers in the United States.
>> Interestingly, a lesser-known provider, Consumer Cellular, proved to be the
>> most satisfying to customers.
>>
>> The survey is based upon the responses from more than 66,000 subscribers
>> of Consumer Reports with carrier ratings for 22 metropolitan markets. Poll
>> participants were asked to rate service and the customer support experience
>> with both standard and no-contract cell phone providers.
>>
>> When it comes to the top tier domestic mobile providers, Verizon topped
>> the charts, and Sprint reportedly followed. T-Mobile didn't do as well, but
>> at least it fared better than AT&T.
>>
>> One could argue that AT&T can't seem to catch a break lately. First, it
>> has encountered enormous hurdles as of late in its now beleaguered bid to
>> buyout T-Mobile for the purpose of expanding its own 4G network, which
>> might actually be useful to some customers.
>>
>> Nevertheless, opponents such as Sprint would argue that move isn't
>> necessary, and that AT&T needs to dig deeper to fix itself.
>>
>> Based on the fact that AT&T has been at the bottom of the polls at least
>> two years in a row, the telecommunications company really only has itself
>> to blame at this point.
- 7d.
-
Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv
Posted by: "Techlady" techlady04@yahoo.com techlady04
Tue Dec 6, 2011 7:55 pm (PST)
Ditto!
TL
On Dec 6, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Brent <flapdoodle@gmail.com > wrote:
> They sure didn't ask me. I am an AT&T fan. Service where I am and for
> hundreds of miles around are better than any of the others. Service at the
> AT&T store have always be outstanding also.
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:50 PM, rkkeller8 <thekellergroup@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>> **
>> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/ btl/consumer- reports-ranks- at-t-as-lowest- again-in- satisfaction- survey/64789? tag=nl.e589
>>
>> Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction survey
>>
>> By Rachel King | December 6, 2011, 9:28am PST
>>
>> Summary: AT&T can't catch a break, but maybe the telecommunications
>> provider only has itself to blame.
>>
>> Once again, AT&T has proven to be somewhat of a disappointment to
>> consumers, according to Consumer Reports.
>>
>> The publication's annual satisfaction survey found that AT&T was ranked at
>> the bottom of the major mobile carriers in the United States.
>> Interestingly, a lesser-known provider, Consumer Cellular, proved to be the
>> most satisfying to customers.
>>
>> The survey is based upon the responses from more than 66,000 subscribers
>> of Consumer Reports with carrier ratings for 22 metropolitan markets. Poll
>> participants were asked to rate service and the customer support experience
>> with both standard and no-contract cell phone providers.
>>
>> When it comes to the top tier domestic mobile providers, Verizon topped
>> the charts, and Sprint reportedly followed. T-Mobile didn't do as well, but
>> at least it fared better than AT&T.
>>
>> One could argue that AT&T can't seem to catch a break lately. First, it
>> has encountered enormous hurdles as of late in its now beleaguered bid to
>> buyout T-Mobile for the purpose of expanding its own 4G network, which
>> might actually be useful to some customers.
>>
>> Nevertheless, opponents such as Sprint would argue that move isn't
>> necessary, and that AT&T needs to dig deeper to fix itself.
>>
>> Based on the fact that AT&T has been at the bottom of the polls at least
>> two years in a row, the telecommunications company really only has itself
>> to blame at this point.
- 7e.
-
Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv
Posted by: "whiterabbit32" whiterabbit32@gmail.com lwr0032
Tue Dec 6, 2011 9:12 pm (PST)
I take the report with a grain of salt as I do Consumer Reports.
Alice
Sent from my iPad 2
On Dec 6, 2011, at 1:50 PM, "rkkeller8" <thekellergroup@gmail.com > wrote:
> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/ btl/consumer- reports-ranks- at-t-as-lowest- again-in- satisfaction- survey/64789? tag=nl.e589
>
> Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction survey
>
> By Rachel King | December 6, 2011, 9:28am PST
>
> Summary: AT&T can't catch a break, but maybe the telecommunications provider only has itself to blame.
>
> Once again, AT&T has proven to be somewhat of a disappointment to consumers, according to Consumer Reports.
>
> The publication's annual satisfaction survey found that AT&T was ranked at the bottom of the major mobile carriers in the United States. Interestingly, a lesser-known provider, Consumer Cellular, proved to be the most satisfying to customers.
>
> The survey is based upon the responses from more than 66,000 subscribers of Consumer Reports with carrier ratings for 22 metropolitan markets. Poll participants were asked to rate service and the customer support experience with both standard and no-contract cell phone providers.
>
> When it comes to the top tier domestic mobile providers, Verizon topped the charts, and Sprint reportedly followed. T-Mobile didn't do as well, but at least it fared better than AT&T.
>
> One could argue that AT&T can't seem to catch a break lately. First, it has encountered enormous hurdles as of late in its now beleaguered bid to buyout T-Mobile for the purpose of expanding its own 4G network, which might actually be useful to some customers.
>
> Nevertheless, opponents such as Sprint would argue that move isn't necessary, and that AT&T needs to dig deeper to fix itself.
>
> Based on the fact that AT&T has been at the bottom of the polls at least two years in a row, the telecommunications company really only has itself to blame at this point.
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 7f.
-
Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv
Posted by: "whiterabbit32" whiterabbit32@gmail.com lwr0032
Tue Dec 6, 2011 9:16 pm (PST)
Cell service with AT&T, for me, is great. I can say, their customer service sucks in my area. They don't know about iPhones. I tell people to get their Apple products wherever BUT when having trouble, go to Apple.
Alice
Sent from my iPad 2
On Dec 6, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Brent <flapdoodle@gmail.com > wrote:
> They sure didn't ask me. I am an AT&T fan. Service where I am and for
> hundreds of miles around are better than any of the others. Service at the
> AT&T store have always be outstanding also.
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:50 PM, rkkeller8 <thekellergroup@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/ btl/consumer- reports-ranks- at-t-as-lowest- again-in- satisfaction- survey/64789? tag=nl.e589
>>
>> Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction survey
>>
>> By Rachel King | December 6, 2011, 9:28am PST
>>
>> Summary: AT&T can't catch a break, but maybe the telecommunications
>> provider only has itself to blame.
>>
>> Once again, AT&T has proven to be somewhat of a disappointment to
>> consumers, according to Consumer Reports.
>>
>> The publication's annual satisfaction survey found that AT&T was ranked at
>> the bottom of the major mobile carriers in the United States.
>> Interestingly, a lesser-known provider, Consumer Cellular, proved to be the
>> most satisfying to customers.
>>
>> The survey is based upon the responses from more than 66,000 subscribers
>> of Consumer Reports with carrier ratings for 22 metropolitan markets. Poll
>> participants were asked to rate service and the customer support experience
>> with both standard and no-contract cell phone providers.
>>
>> When it comes to the top tier domestic mobile providers, Verizon topped
>> the charts, and Sprint reportedly followed. T-Mobile didn't do as well, but
>> at least it fared better than AT&T.
>>
>> One could argue that AT&T can't seem to catch a break lately. First, it
>> has encountered enormous hurdles as of late in its now beleaguered bid to
>> buyout T-Mobile for the purpose of expanding its own 4G network, which
>> might actually be useful to some customers.
>>
>> Nevertheless, opponents such as Sprint would argue that move isn't
>> necessary, and that AT&T needs to dig deeper to fix itself.
>>
>> Based on the fact that AT&T has been at the bottom of the polls at least
>> two years in a row, the telecommunications company really only has itself
>> to blame at this point.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> --------------------- --------- ------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
- 7g.
-
Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv
Posted by: "Moe Rubenzahl" moe6g@rubenzahl.com MRubenzahl
Tue Dec 6, 2011 9:31 pm (PST)
"This was a small survey"
I didn't see this one but saw previous years and it's a very large
survey, of their readers. Looks like 66,000 people this year.
AT&T is always low, Verizon always high. But the survey is nationwide
and individual experiences and certain areas will have different
results.
I'm with those who said AT&T works well. I have very, very few
problems (in San Jose, CA area).
- 7h.
-
Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv
Posted by: "whiterabbit32" whiterabbit32@gmail.com lwr0032
Tue Dec 6, 2011 9:36 pm (PST)
Sacramento Area myself and AT&T works well here. I've never been chosen to take a survey of anything major, except for Apple.
Alice
Sent from my iPad 2
On Dec 6, 2011, at 9:25 PM, Moe Rubenzahl <moe6g@rubenzahl.com > wrote:
> "This was a small survey"
>
> I didn't see this one but saw previous years and it's a very large
> survey, of their readers. Looks like 66,000 people this year.
>
> AT&T is always low, Verizon always high. But the survey is nationwide
> and individual experiences and certain areas will have different
> results.
>
> I'm with those who said AT&T works well. I have very, very few
> problems (in San Jose, CA area).
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 7i.
-
Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv
Posted by: "ROGER PROKIC" rprokic@me.com rprokic
Tue Dec 6, 2011 11:02 pm (PST)
I've had AT&T for the past 10 years at least. Their customer service is amazing in fact, that it's hard to believe this report. Meanwhile I hear so many people complain about Verizon and Sprint customer service. I had T-Mobile before and also loved their service.
Roger
---
Roger Prokic
-=[ this message was sent from my Apple iPhone 4S ]=-
On Dec 7, 2011, at 12:25 AM, Moe Rubenzahl <moe6g@rubenzahl.com > wrote:
> "This was a small survey"
>
> I didn't see this one but saw previous years and it's a very large
> survey, of their readers. Looks like 66,000 people this year.
>
> AT&T is always low, Verizon always high. But the survey is nationwide
> and individual experiences and certain areas will have different
> results.
>
> I'm with those who said AT&T works well. I have very, very few
> problems (in San Jose, CA area).
>
>
> --------------------- --------- ------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
- 7j.
-
Re: Consumer Reports ranks AT&T as lowest again in satisfaction surv
Posted by: "whiterabbit32" whiterabbit32@gmail.com lwr0032
Tue Dec 6, 2011 11:10 pm (PST)
Customer service is so subjective one can't really believe the reports. I think a lot of customer service complaints have to do with things the reps have no control over. I'd like to know what some of the customer complaints are and what segment of people are making the complaints.
Alice
Sent from my iPad 2
On Dec 6, 2011, at 10:51 PM, ROGER PROKIC <rprokic@me.com> wrote:
> I've had AT&T for the past 10 years at least. Their customer service is amazing in fact, that it's hard to believe this report. Meanwhile I hear so many people complain about Verizon and Sprint customer service. I had T-Mobile before and also loved their service.
>
> Roger
>
> ---
> Roger Prokic
>
> -=[ this message was sent from my Apple iPhone 4S ]=-
>
> On Dec 7, 2011, at 12:25 AM, Moe Rubenzahl <moe6g@rubenzahl.com > wrote:
>
> > "This was a small survey"
> >
> > I didn't see this one but saw previous years and it's a very large
> > survey, of their readers. Looks like 66,000 people this year.
> >
> > AT&T is always low, Verizon always high. But the survey is nationwide
> > and individual experiences and certain areas will have different
> > results.
> >
> > I'm with those who said AT&T works well. I have very, very few
> > problems (in San Jose, CA area).
> >
> >
> > --------------------- --------- ------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Need to Reply?
Click one of the "Reply" links to respond to a specific message in the Daily Digest.
MARKETPLACE
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Individual | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
