Messages In This Digest (25 Messages)
- 1a.
- Re: Installing Windows and Fusion From: James Robertson
- 2a.
- Re: Join me on Facebook From: jamesrob@sonic.net
- 2b.
- Re: Join me on Facebook From: Forrest Leedy
- 2c.
- Re: Join me on Facebook From: Michael P. Stupinski
- 2d.
- Re: Join me on Facebook From: Harry Flaxman
- 2e.
- Re: [macsuport] Join … From: N.A. Nada
- 2f.
- Re: Join me on Facebook From: Jim Saklad
- 2g.
- Re: Join me on Facebook From: Andrew Buc
- 2h.
- Re: Join me on Facebook From: DaveC
- 3a.
- Rotating Ext. HDD From: Budd
- 3b.
- Re: Rotating Ext. HDD From: Les Streater
- 4a.
- Re: SSD warning signs of failure From: Tod Hopkins
- 5a.
- Re: Where did my files go? From: Otto Nikolaus
- 5b.
- Re: Where did my files go? From: Dane Robison
- 5c.
- Re: Where did my files go? From: Frank T
- 5d.
- Re: Where did my files go? From: Otto Nikolaus
- 5e.
- Re: Where did my files go? From: OBrien
- 6a.
- Re: Handycam choices From: Otto Nikolaus
- 7a.
- Join... From: N.A. Nada
- 7b.
- Re: Join... From: N.A. Nada
- 7c.
- Re: Join... From: Michel Munger
- 7d.
- Re: Join... From: Harry Flaxman
- 8.
- address book question From: jgarv2002
- 9a.
- OT: Outlook for Mac - question - graphics From: Donna Ells
- 9b.
- Re: OT: Outlook for Mac - question - graphics From: Randy B. Singer
Messages
- 1a.
-
Re: Installing Windows and Fusion
Posted by: "James Robertson" jamesrob@sonic.net jamesrob328i
Sun Jan 1, 2012 5:17 am (PST)
On Dec 31, 2011, at 9:21 AM, harpangel36 wrote:
> I have a new MBP and have installed Fusion and have a couple questions before installing my Windows 7 Home premium. I only use windows for a couple of embroidery programs not available to me on the Mac. I don't need a lot of hard disk space as I really don't intend to use Windows for anything else. How can I manually allocate hard disk space in Fusion? (It seems to want to give me only 40GB of which I don't need that much). Should I choose 32 bit or 64 bit windows? Anything else I should know before installing?
>
> Thanks, Roxanne
>
>
>
You can choose a different virtual HD size, but the actual (Mac) file size of the entire virtual machine (to your Mac, the whole thing is just one huge file) won't be the maximum size you select; the Mac OS will reserve space on your physical drive so that the file can grow to that maximum size - and probably a bit larger, because there will be some overhead to tell the Mac OS how to deal with it. However, if you're using Fusion 3 and Lion, my understanding is that you'll benefit also from the fact that the VM will be "Time Machine Friendly", meaning that your Time Machine backup won't expand by the full current size (or thereabouts) every time you run the virtual machine - Fusion and the Mac OS will figure out how to integrate only what's changed in the VM file into your backup.
As far as 32 bit vs. 64 bit is concerned, for reasons I've never understood it's a much an either/or deal in the Windows world than on the Mac. If your embroidery machinery uses 32-bit drivers, you want 32-bit Windows. By the way, do you have the Designer 1 or a successor? My wife has one and it basically never clicked in her head. I doubt that its motor has run more than 1 hour. Do you have any suggestions for her?
--
Jim Robertson
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 2a.
-
Re: Join me on Facebook
Posted by: "jamesrob@sonic.net" jamesrob@sonic.net jamesrob328i
Sun Jan 1, 2012 5:38 am (PST)
--- In macsupportcentral@yahoogroups. , "ejayz@..." <ejayz@...> wrote:com
>
> Hi,
>
> Wouldn't it be great if we could all link up together on Facebook and
discuss the same issues and news about our Apple products? To all
members of the group who would like to join as my friend on FB please
message me back and I'll send out an invitation to you. This way we can
also send pictures of whatever it is we are trying to explain etc.
>
I'm sorry, I just don't "get" FaceBook. Many people I know and love
spend much of their electronic lives there, but I still find it creepy
that every time I go there to peek at something my son wants me to see I
get a bunch of invitations to become "friends" with all kinds of people
I don't even know. Add that to the repetitive privacy-abusive behavior
of the company's founder, and I find it creepy that so much of the
corporate world seems to want to scrap their own web-maintenance budgets
for Mark Zukerberg's information-sucking engine.
One of the people I know well actually said to me recently (about
someone she truly loathes) "he is positively evil; I don't even have him
on my Facebook page!" as though that were a fate worse than being
relegated to a gulag somewhere.
Personally, I have enough problems with Yahoo's attempts to have its
groups live simultaneously in the web and email worlds.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 2b.
-
Re: Join me on Facebook
Posted by: "Forrest Leedy" f.leedy@comcast.net forrkazu
Sun Jan 1, 2012 6:05 am (PST)
Facebook is a social site that for me is not an easy place to get around in. It is not a site that I would like to see this group go to as I have limited my use of it to the point that I hardly use it at all. As has been said by James, the privacy factor has come under scrutiny several times as Zukerburg wants to open it up to all kinds of abuse in my way of thinking. What Samantha does not get is you can do the same thing on this group that she wants to do on Facebook with the exception that I feel a little more secure on Yahoogroups than on Facebook.
Forrest
On Jan 1, 2012, at 8:38 AM, jamesrob@sonic.net wrote:
>
> --- In macsupportcentral@yahoogroups. , "ejayz@..." <ejayz@...> wrote:com
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Wouldn't it be great if we could all link up together on Facebook and
> discuss the same issues and news about our Apple products? To all
> members of the group who would like to join as my friend on FB please
> message me back and I'll send out an invitation to you. This way we can
> also send pictures of whatever it is we are trying to explain etc.
>>
> I'm sorry, I just don't "get" FaceBook. Many people I know and love
> spend much of their electronic lives there, but I still find it creepy
> that every time I go there to peek at something my son wants me to see I
> get a bunch of invitations to become "friends" with all kinds of people
> I don't even know. Add that to the repetitive privacy-abusive behavior
> of the company's founder, and I find it creepy that so much of the
> corporate world seems to want to scrap their own web-maintenance budgets
> for Mark Zukerberg's information-sucking engine.
> One of the people I know well actually said to me recently (about
> someone she truly loathes) "he is positively evil; I don't even have him
> on my Facebook page!" as though that were a fate worse than being
> relegated to a gulag somewhere.
> Personally, I have enough problems with Yahoo's attempts to have its
> groups live simultaneously in the web and email worlds.
>
- 2c.
-
Re: Join me on Facebook
Posted by: "Michael P. Stupinski" mpstupinski@snet.net mstupinski
Sun Jan 1, 2012 9:07 am (PST)
I agree. I have a Facebook account and have "friended" only two
people...one of my daughters and a neighbor. I don't use Facebook
anymore and have told them we can accomplish anything it can do by
sending each other emails or texts. Forrest and James have
articulated my feelings well. This and other lists I'm on do all that
I need.
...........Mike
On Jan 1, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Forrest Leedy wrote:
> Facebook is a social site that for me is not an easy place to get
> around in. It is not a site that I would like to see this group go
> to as I have limited my use of it to the point that I hardly use it
> at all. As has been said by James, the privacy factor has come
> under scrutiny several times as Zukerburg wants to open it up to all
> kinds of abuse in my way of thinking. What Samantha does not get is
> you can do the same thing on this group that she wants to do on
> Facebook with the exception that I feel a little more secure on
> Yahoogroups than on Facebook.
>
> Forrest
>
> On Jan 1, 2012, at 8:38 AM, jamesrob@sonic.net wrote:
>
>>
>> --- In macsupportcentral@yahoogroups. , "ejayz@..." <ejayz@...>com
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Wouldn't it be great if we could all link up together on Facebook
>>> and
>> discuss the same issues and news about our Apple products? To all
>> members of the group who would like to join as my friend on FB please
>> message me back and I'll send out an invitation to you. This way
>> we can
>> also send pictures of whatever it is we are trying to explain etc.
>>>
>> I'm sorry, I just don't "get" FaceBook. Many people I know and love
>> spend much of their electronic lives there, but I still find it
>> creepy
>> that every time I go there to peek at something my son wants me to
>> see I
>> get a bunch of invitations to become "friends" with all kinds of
>> people
>> I don't even know. Add that to the repetitive privacy-abusive
>> behavior
>> of the company's founder, and I find it creepy that so much of the
>> corporate world seems to want to scrap their own web-maintenance
>> budgets
>> for Mark Zukerberg's information-sucking engine.
>> One of the people I know well actually said to me recently (about
>> someone she truly loathes) "he is positively evil; I don't even
>> have him
>> on my Facebook page!" as though that were a fate worse than being
>> relegated to a gulag somewhere.
>> Personally, I have enough problems with Yahoo's attempts to have its
>> groups live simultaneously in the web and email worlds.
>>
>
>
>
> --------------------- --------- ------
>
> Group FAQ:
> <http://www.macsupportcentral. >com/policies/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
- 2d.
-
Re: Join me on Facebook
Posted by: "Harry Flaxman" harry.flaxman@comcast.net hflaxman001
Sun Jan 1, 2012 9:52 am (PST)
On Jan 1, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Michael P. Stupinski wrote:
> I agree. I have a Facebook account and have "friended" only two
> people...one of my daughters and a neighbor. I don't use Facebook
> anymore and have told them we can accomplish anything it can do by
> sending each other emails or texts. Forrest and James have
> articulated my feelings well. This and other lists I'm on do all that
> I need.
>
> ...........Mike
>
>
> On Jan 1, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Forrest Leedy wrote:
>
>> Facebook is a social site that for me is not an easy place to get
>> around in. It is not a site that I would like to see this group go
>> to as I have limited my use of it to the point that I hardly use it
>> at all. As has been said by James, the privacy factor has come
>> under scrutiny several times as Zukerburg wants to open it up to all
>> kinds of abuse in my way of thinking. What Samantha does not get is
>> you can do the same thing on this group that she wants to do on
>> Facebook with the exception that I feel a little more secure on
>> Yahoogroups than on Facebook.
>>
>> Forrest
>>
>> On Jan 1, 2012, at 8:38 AM, jamesrob@sonic.net wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> --- In macsupportcentral@yahoogroups. , "ejayz@..." <ejayz@...>com
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't it be great if we could all link up together on Facebook
>>>> and
>>> discuss the same issues and news about our Apple products? To all
>>> members of the group who would like to join as my friend on FB please
>>> message me back and I'll send out an invitation to you. This way
>>> we can
>>> also send pictures of whatever it is we are trying to explain etc.
>>>>
>>> I'm sorry, I just don't "get" FaceBook. Many people I know and love
>>> spend much of their electronic lives there, but I still find it
>>> creepy
>>> that every time I go there to peek at something my son wants me to
>>> see I
>>> get a bunch of invitations to become "friends" with all kinds of
>>> people
>>> I don't even know. Add that to the repetitive privacy-abusive
>>> behavior
>>> of the company's founder, and I find it creepy that so much of the
>>> corporate world seems to want to scrap their own web-maintenance
>>> budgets
>>> for Mark Zukerberg's information-sucking engine.
>>> One of the people I know well actually said to me recently (about
>>> someone she truly loathes) "he is positively evil; I don't even
>>> have him
>>> on my Facebook page!" as though that were a fate worse than being
>>> relegated to a gulag somewhere.
>>> Personally, I have enough problems with Yahoo's attempts to have its
>>> groups live simultaneously in the web and email worlds.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------- --------- ------
>>
>> Group FAQ:
>> <http://www.macsupportcentral. >com/policies/
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
When many privacy issues started surfacing with FB, I immediately 'deactivated' my account there. Well over 1.5 years ago. I am astonished that there was no option to get rid of the account. I subsequently had emails related to that account start 'flowing' again, and contacted FB twice about this. I went in each time and deactivated once more.
I finally had to threaten the folks at FB with legal action and publicity regarding the issue. Since then, the account as stayed dormant.
Take care and monitor your accounts once deactivated. For some reason, they used to come back to life without user interaction at one point.
Another 'FEATURE' of FB?? Probably
H
Harry Flaxman
harry.flaxman@comcast.net
- 2e.
-
Re: [macsuport] Join …
Posted by: "N.A. Nada" whodo678@comcast.net
Sun Jan 1, 2012 11:06 am (PST)
Well, you all missed the point of the email.
ejayz, Samantha Candice, has posted only once to this list, and look at the name. Does it sound right?
"Her" first email to the list is an attempt to see who will move to another forum, a site that reveals more of your personal
information.
This was a farming or phishing attempt, a social engineering attempt to harvest just susceptible or ripe potential victims. She doesn't even have to read and type in the names, the victims do it for her.
If I am wrong, by apologies, but I doubt I am wrong.
Brent
> >>> --- In macsupportcentral@yahoogroups. , "ejayz@..." <ejayz@...>com
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Wouldn't it be great if we could all link up together on Facebook
> >>>> and
> >>> discuss the same issues and news about our Apple products?
- 2f.
-
Re: Join me on Facebook
Posted by: "Jim Saklad" jimdoc@me.com jimdoc01
Sun Jan 1, 2012 11:07 am (PST)
> Wouldn't it be great if we could all link up together on Facebook and discuss the same issues and news about our Apple products?
No.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@me.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 2g.
-
Re: Join me on Facebook
Posted by: "Andrew Buc" andrewbuc@staxman.net andrewbuc
Sun Jan 1, 2012 11:11 am (PST)
On Jan 1, 2012, at 1:52 AM, ejayz@y7mail.com wrote:
> This way we can also send pictures of whatever it is we are trying
> to explain etc.
We can do that here too. What do you see as the advantage(s) of
Facebook?
- 2h.
-
Re: Join me on Facebook
Posted by: "DaveC" davec2468@yahoo.com davec2468
Sun Jan 1, 2012 12:29 pm (PST)
This is spam.
I see no other posts in the past year from "Samantha". This is the
only post she has made, to "friend" her.
Hmm...
Dave
-=-=-=-
>Hi,
>
>Wouldn't it be great if we could all link up together on Facebook
>and discuss the same issues and news about our Apple products? To
>all members of the group who would like to join as my friend on FB
>please message me back and I'll send out an invitation to you. This
>way we can also send pictures of whatever it is we are trying to
>explain etc.
>
>Looking forward to seeing you all on FB
>
>Regards,
>
>Samantha Candice
- 3a.
-
Rotating Ext. HDD
Posted by: "Budd" n7eoj@yahoo.com n7eoj
Sun Jan 1, 2012 6:18 am (PST)
I put an external HDD on my iMac right after I got it.
When it failed the manufacturer provided a refurbished replacement which failed in less than ten months. They were not going to stand behind their refurbished HDD, but offered me a "Good customer discount" amounting to ~1/2 of the S&H on a new one.
I decided to start doing backups the way we do in data centers I helped build and rotate multiple HDD, instead of tapes.
I researched HDD reliability to determine the Hitachi line currently appear to be best.
I acquired a Newer Technology VoyagerQ from OWC, with three 1TB Hatachi HDD.
I got the "Q" to have exclusive use of the Firewire 800 channel. There is already too much being shared on USB.
I named the three HDD sequentially to facilitatea rotation schedule and introduced them to Time Machine.
Each weekend I eject the currently connected HDD, power down the iMac & Voyager, swap with next HDD.
Then I power up the Voyager, then the iMac and associate the new HDD in TM Preferences and tell it to backup.
Even though the Voyager is advertised hot swappable, I follow that sequence because I have never been comfortable swapping hardware in powered devices. Also, I don't know if the deficiency is in iMac Firewire or 1394 spec but it doesn't handle discovery as well as USB.
Say what you will about TM, it does it's job and will let you know if there is a problem. Hourly backups are good for a production environment, but overkill for personal use. In retrospect though, that means little will have changed and the b/u will be short.
I also share the Ext. HDD for cache in a separate folder and they get along fine, with less thrashing on my internal HDD.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 3b.
-
Re: Rotating Ext. HDD
Posted by: "Les Streater" lesstreater@marpubs.demon.co.uk linernutuk
Sun Jan 1, 2012 6:32 am (PST)
Hourly seemed excessive to me too, so I tried a programme called Time Machine Editor. Works alongside Time Machine but allows you to control what is backed up and when. I have mine set to twice a day.
I also use a programme called Back Up Loupe to watch exactly what is being archived.
Can recommend both, have used for about 12 months
On 1 Jan 2012, at 14:18, Budd wrote:
> Hourly backups are good for a production environment, but overkill for personal use. In retrospect though, that means little will have changed and the b/u will be short.
> .
>
>
>
Les Streater
www.lesstreater.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 4a.
-
Re: SSD warning signs of failure
Posted by: "Tod Hopkins" hoplist@hillmanncarr.com todhop
Sun Jan 1, 2012 6:48 am (PST)
On Dec 31, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Denver dan wrote:
> I assumed SSD, with no moving parts, would be naturally more reliable than HD but I'm beginning to think I shouldn't have made that assumption!
Well, considering that the most likely failure points in an external hard drive are power and the controller card, maybe not. Someday maybe, but right now SSD is an "emerging" technology. Never trust the latest and greatest.
Cheers,
tod
Tod Hopkins
Hillmann & Carr Inc.
todhopkins@hillmanncarr.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 5a.
-
Re: Where did my files go?
Posted by: "Otto Nikolaus" otto.nikolaus@googlemail.com nikyzf
Sun Jan 1, 2012 8:38 am (PST)
2011/12/30 OBrien <bco@hiwaay.net>
>
> I assume OSX simply bypasses the Trashcan, and just makes the file
> invisible in the directory...same thing, I guess, that would be done if the
> files had been moved to the trash, and then the trash emptied...just
> without going through that process.
>
Just tried this in 10.5.8, copying to an SD card, then back to another
folder. In each case, command-z undoes the copy and there is *nothing* in
the Trash. As distinct from deletion, it's as if the action never happened
in the first place, except that you can redo it (as long as the source for
the copy is still available).
Strange that, like many others, I've never had reason to discover this
before. Imagine that you copy image files from a camera's card, wipe the
card, then accidentally undo the copy! You have lost your photos unless you
use recovery software before you next use the card.
:-(
Otto
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 5b.
-
Re: Where did my files go?
Posted by: "Dane Robison" macdane@mac.com macdane1
Sun Jan 1, 2012 9:16 am (PST)
On Jan 1, 2012, at 11:37 AM, Otto Nikolaus wrote:
> Strange that, like many others, I've never had reason to discover this
> before. Imagine that you copy image files from a camera's card, wipe
> the
> card, then accidentally undo the copy! You have lost your photos
> unless you
> use recovery software before you next use the card.
> :-(
Yes, something to be aware of, for sure. It strikes me as a bit funny
that Apple allows it to work this way, given that it's basically a
"completely delete instantly" command, with no warning whatsoever.
Happy new year!
Dane
- 5c.
-
Re: Where did my files go?
Posted by: "Frank T" fjt2@mac.com frankt192
Sun Jan 1, 2012 10:50 am (PST)
Sounds as if you deleted the files buy using command-z, it undid the last thing.
--- In macsupportcentral@yahoogroups. , Dane Robison <macdane@...com > wrote:
>
> This is a weird problem...I'm not even sure how to construct a short
> but meaningful subject line. 10.5.8 and here's the scenario:
>
> 1. Copied almost 5000 photos from a compact flash camera card to my
> laptop, using Finder.
> 2. Did a bunch of other, unrelated work over the next several hours.
> 3. Hit command-z to undo something; whatever it was appears not to be
> undoable, because I got a little progress window showing "Undoing Copy
> of Almost 5000 Photos from Compact Flash Card"
>
> I canceled the operation immediately, but am left with only 89 of the
> nearly 5000 photos. The CF card is no longer in my possession and
> there's nothing in the trash. Where did those files go?
>
> Thanks,
> Dane
>
- 5d.
-
Re: Where did my files go?
Posted by: "Otto Nikolaus" otto.nikolaus@googlemail.com nikyzf
Sun Jan 1, 2012 10:56 am (PST)
Yes, as discussed for several days now.
;)
Otto
On 1 January 2012 18:50, Frank T <fjt2@mac.com> wrote:
> Sounds as if you deleted the files buy using command-z, it undid the last
> thing.
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 5e.
-
Re: Where did my files go?
Posted by: "OBrien" bco@hiwaay.net conorboru
Sun Jan 1, 2012 4:08 pm (PST)
On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 16:37:40 +0000, Otto Nikolaus wrote:
> Strange that, like many others, I've never had reason to discover this
> before. Imagine that you copy image files from a camera's card, wipe the
> card, then accidentally undo the copy! You have lost your photos unless you
> use recovery software before you next use the card.
Unless you immediately "Undo" the "Undo"...this will bring them back. They're not actually +gone+...they're just not visible in the directory.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O'Brien ¡V¡V¡V ¡V... .-. .. . -.
- 6a.
-
Re: Handycam choices
Posted by: "Otto Nikolaus" otto.nikolaus@googlemail.com nikyzf
Sun Jan 1, 2012 9:10 am (PST)
Just to add to the confusion, try this.
<
http://www.maximumpc.com/article/ features/ how_buy_sd_ card_your_ digital_camera
>
Otto
On 30 December 2011 18:22, Jurgen Richter <yahoo-1@sympatico.ca > wrote:
> My question to the group is, does anyone have experience with using
> memory cards for taking full HD 1080 videos? And what length of video
> can be recorded on a 16GB High Speed Memory card?
>
> A quick answer is 160 minutes. Based on HD video being 1920x1080 with
> MP4 HD codec. See:
>
> http://duracellflash.com/capacitych art.htm
>
>
>
> Here is a good link to give you more information on Secure Digital Cards
> for your handycam.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Secure_Digital# UHS_Speed_ Class
>
> Another one I found as I got a deal on these at my local store ($5 for a
> 4 GB card):
> As it turns out, it is an "ok" card as it's not the fastest, but will be
> fine for my scanner and digital photobook, not so great for the digital
> camera as it is slower than other cards. The one I got was a Class 4
> card, and for shooting the biggest and/or RAW files I need something
> faster. My other cards are class 6 and faster. In a nutshell, the class
> category is the data write rate per second in MB, so a Class 10 card is
> rated at 10 MB per second or faster in transfering the data from camera
> to card.
>
> http://duracellflash.com/securedigi tal.htm
>
>
> Here you can click on other links for additional information for your
> purposes.
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 7a.
-
Join...
Posted by: "N.A. Nada" whodo678@comcast.net
Sun Jan 1, 2012 11:30 am (PST)
> >>> --- In macsupportcentral@yahoogroups. , "ejayz@..." <ejayz@...>com
> >>> wrote:
To all members of the group who would like to join as my friend on FB please message me back and I'll send out an invitation to you.
And if "she" were serious, why does she need you to "message me back" and send out an invitation. An Australian email account might explain the non-US choice of words and the combination of two first names. But groups or companies don't have to send out invitations in Facebook.
Or why didn't she just sent a URL to a FB page?
Again, I offer apologies, if I am wrong, but the more I look at "her" post the more I think it is bogus.
This is another reason I am sorry this group dropped it's probation period.
Brent
- 7b.
-
Re: Join...
Posted by: "N.A. Nada" whodo678@comcast.net
Sun Jan 1, 2012 12:38 pm (PST)
Finally, someone else who sees ejayz's post as spam.
- 7c.
-
Re: Join...
Posted by: "Michel Munger" michel@macsupportcentral.com mmungermtl
Sun Jan 1, 2012 1:17 pm (PST)
User banned.
Michel (Group owner, starting the new year strongly ;-)
Sent from my iPhone
On 2012-01-01, at 15:38, "N.A. Nada" <whodo678@comcast.net > wrote:
> Finally, someone else who sees ejayz's post as spam.
>
>
> --------------------- --------- ------
>
> Group FAQ:
> <http://www.macsupportcentral. >com/policies/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
- 7d.
-
Re: Join...
Posted by: "Harry Flaxman" harry.flaxman@comcast.net hflaxman001
Sun Jan 1, 2012 2:21 pm (PST)
On Jan 1, 2012, at 4:17 PM, Michel Munger wrote:
> User banned.
>
> Michel (Group owner, starting the new year strongly ;-)
Michel,
Thanks!
How about re-instituting the probation period?
Harry
Harry Flaxman
harry.flaxman@comcast.net
- 8.
-
address book question
Posted by: "jgarv2002" jim@mcgarvie.us jgarv2002
Sun Jan 1, 2012 2:21 pm (PST)
I'm a recent convert from Outlook to Address Book. In Outlook, when I wanted to separate email addresses for a husband and a wife, I could specify the "display as" name for each of their addresses and send an email to whichever I wanted (or both). I don't see a way of doing that in Address Book without having three separate entries for each family: husband, wife, and both (for sending Christmas cards, for example).
Am I missing something?
Thanks.
Best,
Jim
- 9a.
-
OT: Outlook for Mac - question - graphics
Posted by: "Donna Ells" dellis70@tampabay.rr.com dellis551
Sun Jan 1, 2012 2:54 pm (PST)
Happy New Year, everyone!
I am running 27" iMac, quad core, i5, 10.6.8. Recently I changed e-mail apps
from Eudora to MS Office Outlook. So far so good. But my animated graphics
do not animate. I can receive animations from others, but for some reason,
my gifs won't animate on Outlook. They do not arrive at their destinations
animated, either.
Am I doing something wrong? I hope someone here knows the answer, as I
couldn't find it on the Mac Office forum.
Thanks in advance,
Donna__
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 9b.
-
Re: OT: Outlook for Mac - question - graphics
Posted by: "Randy B. Singer" randy@macattorney.com randybrucesinger
Sun Jan 1, 2012 3:48 pm (PST)
On Jan 1, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Donna Ells wrote:
> I am running 27" iMac, quad core, i5, 10.6.8. Recently I changed e-
> mail apps
> from Eudora to MS Office Outlook. So far so good. But my animated
> graphics
> do not animate.
This is normal.
<http://office.microsoft. com/en-us/ outlook-help/ my-animated- gif-won-t-
play-HP001149678.aspx>
or
http://is.gd/bsu9Ug
"To play animated GIF files, you must open the files in the Preview/
Properties window. To do this, select the animated GIF file, and then
on the View menu, click Preview/Properties."
_____________________ _________ _________ ____
Randy B. Singer
Co-author of The Macintosh Bible (4th, 5th, and 6th editions)
Macintosh OS X Routine Maintenance
http://www.macattorney.com/ts. html
_____________________ _________ _________ ____
Need to Reply?
Click one of the "Reply" links to respond to a specific message in the Daily Digest.
MARKETPLACE
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Individual | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
