Messages In This Digest (25 Messages)
- 1a.
- Re: Copying networked files From: Richie Z
- 1b.
- Re: Copying networked files From: Tod Hopkins
- 2a.
- Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud From: bob morin
- 2b.
- Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud From: Bill B.
- 2c.
- Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud From: Jim Saklad
- 2d.
- Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud From: Bill B.
- 2e.
- Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud From: bob morin
- 2f.
- Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud From: Dane Robison
- 2g.
- Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud From: Jim Saklad
- 3a.
- Re: "Another device using IP address" From: Tod Hopkins
- 4.
- ADMIN (was Re: [macsupport] Technical grammar) From: Michel Munger
- 5a.
- Disabling the Cap Locks Key From: Bill B.
- 5b.
- Re: Disabling the Cap Locks Key From: Harry Flaxman
- 5c.
- Re: Disabling the Cap Locks Key From: Harry Flaxman
- 5d.
- Re: Disabling the Cap Locks Key From: Keith Whaley
- 6a.
- Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud (question re: Sandvox) From: Jim Robertson
- 6b.
- Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud (question re: Sandvox) From: Barb Adamski
- 7a.
- Re: reCAPTCHA From: Jeannie
- 7b.
- Re: reCAPTCHA From: Josephine Bacon
- 7c.
- Re: reCAPTCHA From: Harry Flaxman
- 7d.
- Re: reCAPTCHA From: Denver Dan
- 7e.
- Re: reCAPTCHA From: Denver Dan
- 8a.
- Re: iPhoto 9.2 From: bob morin
- 9a.
- Re: Lion 10.7.2 upgrade From: Denver Dan
- 10.
- Snow Leopard + iTunes 10.5: Recommended? From: Rob Frankel
Messages
- 1a.
-
Re: Copying networked files
Posted by: "Richie Z" hotsumatra@mac.com hotsumatra
Fri Oct 14, 2011 4:06 am (PDT)
right click, copy, right click, paste?
.rz
On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:55 AM, DaveC wrote:
> Todd,
> In a Finder window I click on a networked computer icon under
> "Shared" in the left column. Then I click on the "Connect As..."
> button below the tool bar. I enter the user name and password in the
> dialog that appears. I now see 3 folders, each with the "shared" icon
> on them (3 stick figures).
>
> I then open a folder on my computer's hard drive. I drag one of the
> networked computer's folders onto the folder on my HD. As I drag the
> folder, it turns into an alias icon. I drop the folder icon and I see
> an alias of the folder.
>
> Not sure what to do now...
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
> -=-=-=-
>
> >Something is not right about my understanding. Need more details.
> >I know that sound silly, but I do this, literally ever day on many
> >machines.
> >
> >tod
>
> -=-=-=-
>
> > > I want to do a "safety backup" in case something happens while I'm
> >> not in possession of my external backups (long story).
> >>
> >> I connected to a Mac on my LAN (as the one and only registered user)
> >> and dragged the 3 folders on that Mac's HD to my HD. What shows up
> >> are 3 aliases of these folders.
> >>
> >> How can I get the contents of those folders copied using Finder?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> > > Dave
>
--
It doesn't matter what you do
It doesn't matter what you say
There will always be one who wants things the opposite way
We do our best, we try to please
But we're like the rest we're never at ease
You can never please
Anybody
In this world
- --The Shaggs
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 1b.
-
Re: Copying networked files
Posted by: "Tod Hopkins" hoplist@hillmanncarr.com todhop
Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:22 am (PDT)
Oh, I see what I missed. You are dragging a "Shared Folder" (showing the icon) as opposed to a folder that is "shared" (inside a shared resource). Shared Folders (with the icon) behave like drives on the remote system. Frankly, Mac should not use a folder icon for these as they are really mounted network drives.
Bottom line, you can't drag and drop a "Shared Folder" as you have discovered, but you can drag and drop the contents. This will work fine. When I back up shared folders this way, I create a target folder, then "select all" (Cmd-A) on the source and drag to the new target folder. I really don't want the copy to have exactly the same name anyway.
Better yet, use backup software, like Carbon Copy Cloner, to automate this.
Cheers,
tod
On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:55 AM, DaveC wrote:
> Todd,
> In a Finder window I click on a networked computer icon under
> "Shared" in the left column. Then I click on the "Connect As..."
> button below the tool bar. I enter the user name and password in the
> dialog that appears. I now see 3 folders, each with the "shared" icon
> on them (3 stick figures).
>
> I then open a folder on my computer's hard drive. I drag one of the
> networked computer's folders onto the folder on my HD. As I drag the
> folder, it turns into an alias icon. I drop the folder icon and I see
> an alias of the folder.
>
> Not sure what to do now...
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
> -=-=-=-
>
> >Something is not right about my understanding. Need more details.
> >I know that sound silly, but I do this, literally ever day on many
> >machines.
> >
> >tod
>
> -=-=-=-
>
> > > I want to do a "safety backup" in case something happens while I'm
> >> not in possession of my external backups (long story).
> >>
> >> I connected to a Mac on my LAN (as the one and only registered user)
> >> and dragged the 3 folders on that Mac's HD to my HD. What shows up
> >> are 3 aliases of these folders.
> >>
> >> How can I get the contents of those folders copied using Finder?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> > > Dave
>
Tod Hopkins
Hillmann & Carr Inc.
todhopkins@hillmanncarr.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 2a.
-
Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud
Posted by: "bob morin" rbmorin11@gmail.com rbmorin2002
Fri Oct 14, 2011 4:17 am (PDT)
On Oct 13, 2011, at 1:58 PM, Harry Flaxman wrote:
> <http://pogue.blogs.nytimes. >com/2011/ 10/13/a-look- at-icloud/
>
After reading his article and installing the needed software on my computer, I have decided I have no interest in using iCloud. I am retired and do not travel. Other than a cell phone which I use as a phone only I have no mobile devices or interest in getting some. Ten years ago yes as I was traveling a lot. I don't like the automatic features that seem to be coming this way. I want to be able to effect greater control in what gets syncs and what gets propagated.
I keep looking for a cell phone that is a CELL phone only. One that receives, sends calls and stores phone numbers. I carry my phone in my pocket. The camera operates from a button on the side. I have many dozens photos on my foot taken as i remove phone from pocket. I have yet to be able to find a cell phone without a camera. Texting for me on a phone is a nuisance as only texts i get are trash and I have to spend time removing them and on my wife's phone. In some ways I personally am not happy in the directions some of the technology is leading.
bob
- 2b.
-
Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud
Posted by: "Bill B." bill501@mindspring.com kernos501
Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:49 am (PDT)
At 8:23 PM -0400 10/13/11, Michael Stupinski wrote:
>And I will miss synching the calendar on my desktop G5 with my MBP.
Personally I don't trust the cloud, by what ever name, for my personal or secure work data. I've a mechanism for automatically, manually synching what I need with Chronosynch (and iTunes for now).
Bill
--
_____________________ _______
Sent using Eudora in 10.6.8
- 2c.
-
Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud
Posted by: "Jim Saklad" jimdoc@me.com jimdoc01
Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:16 am (PDT)
>> <http://pogue.blogs.nytimes. >com/2011/ 10/13/a-look- at-icloud/
>
> After reading his article and installing the needed software on my computer, I have decided I have no interest in using iCloud. I am retired and do not travel. Other than a cell phone which I use as a phone only I have no mobile devices or interest in getting some. Ten years ago yes as I was traveling a lot. I don't like the automatic features that seem to be coming this way. I want to be able to effect greater control in what gets syncs and what gets propagated.
>
> I keep looking for a cell phone that is a CELL phone only. One that receives, sends calls and stores phone numbers. I carry my phone in my pocket. The camera operates from a button on the side. I have many dozens photos on my foot taken as i remove phone from pocket. I have yet to be able to find a cell phone without a camera. Texting for me on a phone is a nuisance as only texts i get are trash and I have to spend time removing them and on my wife's phone. In some ways I personally am not happy in the directions some of the technology is leading.
>
> bob
Is there a question in there, Bob?
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@me.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 2d.
-
Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud
Posted by: "Bill B." bill501@mindspring.com kernos501
Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:16 am (PDT)
At 7:40 PM -0700 10/13/11, Daly Jessup wrote:
>My own personal site? I can give to you but I haven't used it almost at all, in all these years, because I had me.com. But anway, <http://www.adajessup.com/ >
My personal site, I have hosted on Dreamhost.com for years, iWeb is too limited. I run a basic, static site, a new blog, wiki and gallery, unlimited domains and subdomains, an email server, full shell, FTP and ssh access, unlimited MySQL databases, virtual private server, 7+ TB of disk space and much more for only $21/month. I also sublet space for others which pays for the hosting.
<http://kernunnos.com >
<http://blog.kernunnos. >com
Bill
--
_____________________ _______
Sent using Eudora in 10.6.8
- 2e.
-
Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud
Posted by: "bob morin" rbmorin11@gmail.com rbmorin2002
Fri Oct 14, 2011 8:31 am (PDT)
On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Jim Saklad wrote:
>
>
> Is there a question in there, Bob?
>
No just a comment.
- 2f.
-
Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud
Posted by: "Dane Robison" macdane@mac.com macdane1
Fri Oct 14, 2011 8:39 am (PDT)
On Oct 14, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Jim Saklad wrote:
>> After reading his article and installing the needed software on my
>> computer, I have decided I have no interest in using iCloud. [snip]
>
> Is there a question in there, Bob?
Does there need to be a question?
iCloud is a fairly hot topic right now and discussing it should be
fair game. Whereas folks like Daly and Doug have lamented the loss of
useful features, Bob is just opining about the addition of what he
sees as *useless* features.
Personally, I'm in with the former group. The primary usefulness of
MobileMe -- for me -- derived from iDisk and Photo Gallery. In fact,
the ease and grace with which they allowed me to share photos and
other files with clients generated an awful lot of oohs and aahs...it
was a great reflection on Apple for folks not already in the fold.
Alas, Pogue's "online locker" and the Photo Stream are just not
substitutes.
iDisk had much greater capacity. Sure, I had to pay for it and I still
can, but it won't include the Photo Gallery functionality. And Photo
Stream, as far as I've been able to tell, doesn't offer much utility
to folks like me who take pictures with my Nikon rather than my iPhone
or iPad and edit/store them in Lightroom rather than iPhoto.
So yes, iCloud is free and offers a lot of "stuff" whereas MobileMe
had a price tag. The big difference, for me, is that MobileMe gave me
a couple of great tools and a bunch of fluffy extras, but iCloud is
just the fluff. Kudos to Apple for giving us so much time to find
suitable replacements. I already use DropBox, which is nice but
nowhere near the elegant simplicity of iDisk when it comes to sharing
files with literally anyone. And I've used Flickr for years but it's
membership requirements make it a difficult tool to use for easily
sharing anything from single photos to entire shoots with my clients.
No questions here, just chiming in on the loss of utility.
Dane
- 2g.
-
Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud
Posted by: "Jim Saklad" jimdoc@me.com jimdoc01
Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:52 am (PDT)
>>> After reading his article and installing the needed software on my computer, I have decided I have no interest in using iCloud.
>>
>> Is there a question in there, Bob?
>
> Does there need to be a question?
No, of course there doesn't *need* to be a question.
But as I was reading through the whine, I kept thinking "What is it you would like us to help you with here on *Macsupport*?"
Eventually I saw he just wanted to vent.
> Personally, I'm in with the former group. The primary usefulness of MobileMe -- for me -- derived from iDisk and Photo Gallery. In fact, the ease and grace with which they allowed me to share photos and other files with clients generated an awful lot of oohs and aahs...it was a great reflection on Apple for folks not already in the fold. Alas, Pogue's "online locker" and the Photo Stream are just not substitutes.
I *used* them, but when I saw the handwriting on the wall, I moved to DropBox. Synchronization of contacts, calendars, bookmarks, notes is far more useful to me.
And Find My iPhone....
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
Jim Saklad mailto:jimdoc@me.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 3a.
-
Re: "Another device using IP address"
Posted by: "Tod Hopkins" hoplist@hillmanncarr.com todhop
Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:13 am (PDT)
Do you actually notice a network problem? I find that this message pops occasionally on my network but unless I've actually created a hard conflict (I do use some static addresses), it resolves itself before I can even investigate. In other words, I see the message, but by the time I check, I can't find a conflict and everything is okay.
Cheers,
tod
On Oct 14, 2011, at 2:35 AM, DaveC wrote:
> Small business has ATT / 2-Wire (model 2701HG-B) router. Connected
> via Ethernet is a 1TB Time Capsule. The office Macs (2) are connected
> to the router wirelessly.
>
> All too frequently, a message comes up on one of the iMacs (one
> particular one and only that one) that another device on the network
> is using the same IP address. This does not occur when visitors (with
> laptops or iPhones) are on-site.
>
> The router is configured to deliver all IP addresses via DHCP. There
> are no fixed IP addresses.
>
> If it weren't for the fact that visitors with laptops and iPhones
> sometimes want access to this network, I would filter access using
> MAC hardware addresses. But that's not possible.
>
> Suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
Tod Hopkins
Hillmann & Carr Inc.
todhopkins@hillmanncarr.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 4.
-
ADMIN (was Re: [macsupport] Technical grammar)
Posted by: "Michel Munger" michel@macsupportcentral.com mmungermtl
Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:53 am (PDT)
Hi everyone,
Please do not keep this thread going because it has nothing to do with
our topic.
Thanks.
Michel (Group owner)
-----------------
Jim Saklad said:
>> Howdy.
>> You are all wrong.
>> HDD is clearly a JTI.
>
>
> JTI Inc or Japan Tobacco, a cigarette manufacturing company
> JTI Foundation Inc., the owner of Join the Impact, an American LGBT political movement
> Jungian Type Indicator, a psychometric questionnaire to assess personality types
>
- 5a.
-
Disabling the Cap Locks Key
Posted by: "Bill B." bill501@mindspring.com kernos501
Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:20 am (PDT)
I have a program that would add a preference to disable the Cap Locks Key, but cannot remember its name. There is an option in Double Command, but it is not working for me (10.6.8).
Does anyone have a clue to what it's called?
Thanks,
Bill
--
_____________________ _______
Sent using Eudora in 10.6.8
- 5b.
-
Re: Disabling the Cap Locks Key
Posted by: "Harry Flaxman" harry.flaxman@comcast.net hflaxman001
Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:23 am (PDT)
It's in system preferences/keyboard. Select keyboard modifiers and toggle the caps lock to do nothing.
Harry
On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Bill B. wrote:
> I have a program that would add a preference to disable the Cap Locks Key, but cannot remember its name. There is an option in Double Command, but it is not working for me (10.6.8).
>
> Does anyone have a clue to what it's called?
>
> Thanks,
_____________________ _
Harry Flaxman
harry.flaxman@comcast.net
- 5c.
-
Re: Disabling the Cap Locks Key
Posted by: "Harry Flaxman" harry.flaxman@comcast.net hflaxman001
Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:25 am (PDT)
That should be 'Modifier Keys', not keyboard modifiers.
Harry
On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Harry Flaxman wrote:
> t's in system preferences/keyboard. Select keyboard modifiers and toggle the caps lock to do nothing.
>
> Harry
>
>
> On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Bill B. wrote:
>
>> I have a program that would add a preference to disable the Cap Locks Key, but cannot remember its name. There is an option in Double Command, but it is not working for me (10.6.8).
>>
>> Does anyone have a clue to what it's called?
>>
>> Thanks,
>
> _____________________ _
_____________________ _
Harry Flaxman
harry.flaxman@comcast.net
- 5d.
-
Re: Disabling the Cap Locks Key
Posted by: "Keith Whaley" keith_w@dslextreme.com keith9600
Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:12 am (PDT)
Bill B. wrote:
> I have a program that would add a preference to disable the Cap Locks
> Key, but cannot remember its name. There is an option in Double Command,
> but it is not working for me (10.6.8).
>
> Does anyone have a clue to what it's called?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
I have done just that, and can't recall just what I did, but...
This was published back in September, 2011, by ricochet:
http://johnhaller.com/jh/useful_ stuff/disable_ caps_lock/
Then Harry Flaxman said, today:
"It's in system preferences/keyboard. Select Modifier Keys and toggle
the caps lock to No Action."
That's the one I used. Works just fine.
keith
- 6a.
-
Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud (question re: Sandvox)
Posted by: "Jim Robertson" jamesrob@sonic.net jamesrob328i
Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:40 am (PDT)
Since you're using it, I assume you like it (Sandvox). It's not typically on
lists for easy-to-wrestle-with website generators "for the rest of us," but
Jumsoft makes some really nice looking templates for it. I've been thinking
of trying it out, but doing so is pretty near the bottom of my "do someday"
list :-)
So, is Sandvox easy to use?
Thanks,
Jim Robertson
--
- 6b.
-
Re: Pogue's Look At iCloud (question re: Sandvox)
Posted by: "Barb Adamski" adamski@telus.net bkadamski
Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:06 am (PDT)
It's actually very easy and, for me at least, intuitive.
What I like about it is that it switches between templates nicely. I was fiddling with a site for my daughter's artwork (she studies fine arts) and it was nice to be able to show her how her paintings would look in a number of completely different templates.
The only thing I don't like about Sandvox is that while switching things around in the nav bar area (you just drag and drop), I removed a page and completely lost it. It was really odd. It could be because I am still just using the trial version. I've put my redesign on hold for a bit, but hope to get back to it when I next have some down time.
Barb
On 2011-10-14, at 6:40 AM, Jim Robertson wrote:
> Since you're using it, I assume you like it (Sandvox). It's not typically on
> lists for easy-to-wrestle-with website generators "for the rest of us," but
> Jumsoft makes some really nice looking templates for it. I've been thinking
> of trying it out, but doing so is pretty near the bottom of my "do someday"
> list :-)
>
> So, is Sandvox easy to use?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jim Robertson
> --
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 7a.
-
Re: reCAPTCHA
Posted by: "Jeannie" nikonjeannie@gmail.com chloe898
Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:13 am (PDT)
I HATE captcha. I never can figure out those letters correctly. It often
takes many tries, and the audio choice , I have never tried , as I am hard
of hearing.
Jeannie
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Denver dan <denver.dan@verizon.net > wrote:
> This is an amazing thing.
>
> This is about those garbled words you figure out to enter some web sites.
> The CAPTCHAs that prevent bots from doing spam mischief.
>
> A CAPTCHA means Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers
> and Humans Apart.
>
> Term coined by several computer guys at Carnegie Mellon University in
> Pittsburgh in 2000.
>
> reCAPTCHA is a newish variant that is part of a nearly unknown process to
> digitize books that have been scanned with an OCR program.
>
> A reCAPTCHA has TWO words (instead of one) that you decipher. One of the
> words may be a word garbled by an OCR program. Humans accessing secure web
> sites provide a correction for the garbled word.
>
> Read more:
>
> <http://www.google.com/recaptcha/ >learnmore
>
>
>
> !i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i! i!i!i!i!i! i!i!i!i!i! i!i!i!i!i! i!i!i!i!i! i!i!i!i
> iFrom iDan's iClearly iClouded iPhone!
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> --------------------- --------- ------
>
> Group FAQ:
> <http://www.macsupportcentral. >com/policies/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
--
Jeannie
View my images :
http://www.pbase.com/nikonjeannie
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- 7b.
-
Re: reCAPTCHA
Posted by: "Josephine Bacon" bacon@langservice.com baconandeggs_2001
Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:40 am (PDT)
Agreed, and I suspect that Captcha sometimes doesn't recognize the Mac.
Josephine Bacon
Tamr Translations
197 Kings Cross Road
London WC1X 9DB
Tel: 020 7 278 9490
- 7c.
-
Re: reCAPTCHA
Posted by: "Harry Flaxman" harry.flaxman@comcast.net hflaxman001
Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:54 am (PDT)
On 10/14/2011 10:13 AM, Jeannie wrote:
> I HATE captcha. I never can figure out those letters correctly. It often
> takes many tries, and the audio choice , I have never tried , as I am hard
> of hearing.
>
> Jeannie
Some of the sites that use ordinary Captchas seem to be adept at making
them more difficult to see with time. I use some sites that have added
shadows and blurs that are tough to make out. If I try more than 3
times and can't make it through, I say screw it...the site isn't worth
it! I'm 99.9% right about that judgement as well.
Audio works fine, but why bother. One can also use the screen zoom
feature, that I leave on all the time, to see it more clearly. Again,
why should I have to.
Harry
- 7d.
-
Re: reCAPTCHA
Posted by: "Denver Dan" denver.dan@verizon.net denverdan22180
Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:12 am (PDT)
Howdy.
Try sitting further away from the screen for a moment and looking at
the CAPTCHA then.
Another trick that can help is to squint a bit at the CAPTCHA.
I have problems with them sometimes, too, most folks do, and that's the
nature of a pretty decent way to reduce spam and junk mail.
I've read that at one time before Yahoo started doing CAPTCHAs that
spammers had created millions of email accounts on Yahoo.
Even the first effort at a CAPTCHA was eventually bypassed by some
software that could read the warped style of CAPTCHA and then security
aware web sites put in place a more complex CAPTCHA style.
Denver Dan
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:13:43 -0600, Jeannie wrote:
> I HATE captcha. I never can figure out those letters correctly. It often
> takes many tries, and the audio choice , I have never tried , as I am hard
> of hearing.
>
> Jeannie
- 7e.
-
Re: reCAPTCHA
Posted by: "Denver Dan" denver.dan@verizon.net denverdan22180
Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:13 am (PDT)
Howdy.
CAPTCHA has nothing to do with Mac, PeeCee, Linux, or OS versions or
platforms ability to deal with it.
Denver Dan
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:40:33 +0100, Josephine Bacon wrote:
> Agreed, and I suspect that Captcha sometimes doesn't recognize the Mac.
> Josephine Bacon
- 8a.
-
Re: iPhoto 9.2
Posted by: "bob morin" rbmorin11@gmail.com rbmorin2002
Fri Oct 14, 2011 8:34 am (PDT)
On Oct 12, 2011, at 5:32 PM, Otto Nikolaus wrote:
> You sync to an ATV1 (the ATV2 does not sync in case anyone asks) using
> iTunes. In iTunes, you can select any folder containing images to sync with
> iOS devices. I cannot see that the version of iPhoto is relevant in any
> way.
I agree with you and loaded in the new iPhoto. I hadn't sync my atv1 for a while and notice that the recent iTunes syncs a bit differently.. However as I noted in earlier post I don't plan to use photo stream.
bob
- 9a.
-
Re: Lion 10.7.2 upgrade
Posted by: "Denver Dan" denver.dan@verizon.net denverdan22180
Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:35 am (PDT)
Howdy.
Thanks for your note, Jim.
I've been so focused on other things like learning to use iCloud that I
haven't paid much attention to X 10.7.2.
You're right! Preview does open faster in 10.7.2.
Denver Dan
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:36:11 -0400, Jim Smith wrote:
> With all the excitement about IOS 5, there has not been any mention
> of Lion update.
>
> I have a new 27in iMac i7 with factory installed Lion. I order it the
> day Lion was available.
>
> File opening and saving has been for the pits. It seamed to have
> taken forever to open a file. Like click on a newly created screen
> dump it would take Preview 20 to 30 seconds to open and display, even
> if Preview was running.
>
> Lion 10.7.2 seamed to have fixed what ever was wrong.
>
> Jim Smith
- 10.
-
Snow Leopard + iTunes 10.5: Recommended?
Posted by: "Rob Frankel" rob@robfrankel.com robfrankeldotcom
Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:41 am (PDT)
I'm still on Snow Leopard. Any issues/advice before deciding whether
to go to iTunes 10.5?
--
Rob Frankel, Branding Expert
Twitter: @brandingexpert http://www.RobFrankel.com
http://www.PeerMailing.com http://www.i-legions.com
http://www.FrankelAnderson.com
Yes, there's an RSS feed blog, if you can handle it:
http://www.robfrankelblog.com
Need to Reply?
Click one of the "Reply" links to respond to a specific message in the Daily Digest.
MARKETPLACE
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Individual | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
